2001
DOI: 10.1007/s001800100075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Comparison of Association Rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values on intersections represent the strength of rules (support or confidence). Hofmann in his modification [9] used to express the support and confidence of a rule colours and tones. The two-dimensional makes it possible to visualize only matrix only of one-to-one associations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values on intersections represent the strength of rules (support or confidence). Hofmann in his modification [9] used to express the support and confidence of a rule colours and tones. The two-dimensional makes it possible to visualize only matrix only of one-to-one associations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An association graph can quickly turn into a tangled display with as few rules. Mosaic plot was introduced by [7] to visualize contingency tables and have been arranged for association rules in [29]. Each rule is represented by a rectangle, whose width is the support and height is the confidence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Hao et al, 2001), the method is implemented in 3D with a self-organization algorithm which optimizes the graph layout in space. A second rule visualization method consists in using a matrix representation (Hofmann and Wilhelm, 2001) (Han et al, 1997). In an item-to-item matrix, each line corresponds to an antecedent item and each column to a consequent item.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%