Visual change detection recruits auditory cortices in early deafness

Bottari, Davide; Heimler, Benedetta; Caclin, Anne; Dalmolin, Anna; Giard, Marie‐Hélène; Pavani, Francesco

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.031

Cited by 81 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Out of 33 reviewed studies 16 evaluated obligatory sensory components beside the vMMN. The sensory processing was disturbed in 13 of them (Bottari et al, 2014;Cleary, Donkers, Evans, & Belger, 2013;Clery et al, 2012;Clery, Roux, et al, 2013;Fisher et al, 2010;Iijima et al, 1996;Kremlacek et al, 2011;Lorenzo-Lopez et al, 2004;Maekawa et al, 2013Maekawa et al, , 2011Stothart et al, 2014Stothart et al, , 2013, whereas deficits only in components related to processing of deviants was observed in two studies only (Tales & Butler, 2006;Urban et al, 2008). The almost ubiquitous impairment of sensory stimulus processing in reviewed studies suggests that vMMN impairment is not necessarily the only candidate marker for impairments of perceptual processes.…”

Section: Specificity To Predictive Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bottari et al (2014) compared vMMN between a group of subjects with early deafness and a hearing control group. The authors used motion stimuli in the near periphery of the visual field and allocated the subject's attention centrally by a simple detection task.…”

Section: Miscellaneousmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, using aMMN is also not feasible in cases of severe auditory impairment, where, nevertheless, vMMN might be fruitful. For example, Bottari et al (2014) used vMMN to assess plastic reorganization of the auditory cortex in early deafness and showed that cross-modally recruited auditory cortex participates in predictive processing of visual information.…”

Section: Conclusion and Directions For Further Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN): A review and meta-analysis of studies in psychiatric and neurological disorders

Kremláček

Kreegipuu

Tales

et al. 2016

Cortex

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) response is an event-related potential (ERP) component, which is automatically elicited by events that violate predictions based on prior events. VMMN experiments use visual stimulus repetition to induce predictions, and vMMN is obtained by subtracting the response to rare unpredicted stimuli from those to frequent stimuli. One increasingly popular interpretation of the mismatch response postulates that vMMN, similar to its auditory counterpart (aMMN), represents a prediction error response generated by cortical mechanisms forming probabilistic representations of sensory signals. Here we discuss the physiological and theoretical basis of vMMN and review thirty-three studies from the emerging field of its clinical applications, presenting a meta-analysis of findings in schizophrenia, mood disorders, substance abuse, neurodegenerative disorders, developmental disorders, deafness, panic disorder and hypertension. Furthermore, we include reports on aging and maturation as they bear upon many clinically relevant conditions. Surveying the literature we found that vMMN is altered in several clinical populations which is in line with aMMN findings. An important potential advantage of vMMN however is that it allows the investigation of deficits in predictive processing in cognitive domains which rely primarily on visual information; a principal sensory modality and thus of vital importance in environmental information processing and response, and a modality which arguably may be more sensitive to some pathological changes. However, due to the relative infancy of research in vMMN compared to aMMN in clinical populations its potential for clinical application is not yet fully appreciated. The aim of this review and meta-analysis therefore is to present, in a detailed systematic manner, the findings from clinically-based vMMN studies, to discuss their potential impact and application, to raise awareness of this measure and to improve our understanding of disease upon fundamental aspects of visual information processing. Furthermore, we include reports on aging and maturation as they bear upon many clinically relevant conditions. Surveying the literature we found that vMMN is altered in several 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 clinical populations which is in line with aMMN findings. An important potential advantage of vMMN however is that it allows the investigation of deficits in predictive processing in cognitive domains which rely primarily on visual information; a principal sensor...

show abstract

Section: Specificity To Predictive Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Miscellaneousmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Conclusion and Directions For Further Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN): A review and meta-analysis of studies in psychiatric and neurological disorders

Kremláček

Kreegipuu

Tales

et al. 2016

Cortex

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…67 Executive functioning consists of multiple components—ie, working memory, controlled attention, self-monitoring, organisation, inhibition, flexibility-shifting, and goal direction. 68 Verbal working memory, 69,70 controlled cognitive fluency, 67,71 re distribution of attentional resources, 21,72,73 and inhibition–concentration are at risk for delays in individuals with early deafness despite cochlear implantation. 66,74,75 Verbal working memory is assessed with neurocognitive methods that require individuals to hold a sequence of familiar verbal stimuli— eg, digits, letters, or words—in immediate memory while simultaneously engaging in another cognitive activity, such as reversing the order of test items or completing a simple mental calculation (appendix).…”

Section: Clinical Assessment Of Neurocognitive Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model

Kral

Kronenberger

Pisoni

et al. 2016

The Lancet Neurology

274

240

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Progress in biomedical technology (cochlear, vestibular, and retinal implants) has led to remarkable success in neurosensory restoration, particularly in the auditory system. However, outcomes vary considerably, even after accounting for comorbidity—for example, after cochlear implantation, some deaf children develop spoken language skills approaching those of their hearing peers, whereas other children fail to do so. Here, we review evidence that auditory deprivation has widespread effects on brain development, affecting the capacity to process information beyond the auditory system. After sensory loss and deafness, the brain’s effective connectivity is altered within the auditory system, between sensory systems, and between the auditory system and centres serving higher order neurocognitive functions. As a result, congenital sensory loss could be thought of as a connectome disease, with interindividual variability in the brain’s adaptation to sensory loss underpinning much of the observed variation in outcome of cochlear implantation. Different executive functions, sequential processing, and concept formation are at particular risk in deaf children. A battery of clinical tests can allow early identification of neurocognitive risk factors. Intervention strategies that address these impairments with a personalised approach, taking interindividual variations into account, will further improve outcomes.

show abstract

“…Regarding the ability to detect visual events, one might expect that CI users show faster RTs to visual stimuli as a consequence of auditory deprivation. There is increasing evidence for visual-induced activation of auditory cortex in deaf individuals and CI users, suggesting a cross-modal type of reorganization as a result of auditory deprivation (Bavelier and Neville, 2002;Bottari et al, 2014;Sandmann et al, 2012). This reorganization may allow superior visual abilities in CI users.…”

Section: Detection Of Auditory and Visual Events In CI Users And In Nmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhanced audio–visual interactions in the auditory cortex of elderly cochlear-implant users

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Visual change detection recruits auditory cortices in early deafness

Cited by 81 publications

References 82 publications

Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN): A review and meta-analysis of studies in psychiatric and neurological disorders

Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN): A review and meta-analysis of studies in psychiatric and neurological disorders

Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model

Enhanced audio–visual interactions in the auditory cortex of elderly cochlear-implant users

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About