Visual brokerage: Communicating data and research through visualisation

Abstract

Researchers increasingly use visualisation to make sense of their data and communicate findings more widely. But these are not necessarily straightforward processes. Theories of knowledge brokerage show how sociopolitical contexts and intermediary organisations that translate research for public audiences shape how users engage with evidence. Applying these ideas to data visualisation, I argue that several kinds of brokers (such as data collectors, designers and intermediaries) link researchers and audiences, contributing to the ways that people engage with visualisations. To do this, I draw on qualitative focus groups that elicited non-academic viewers’ reactions to visualisations of data about UK migration. The results reveal two important features of engagement: perceptions of brokers’ credibility and feelings of surprise arising from visualisations’ content and design. I conclude by arguing that researchers, knowledge brokers and the public produce – as well as operate within – a complex visualisation space characterised by mutual, bi-directional connections.

Web-Based Visualization of Scientific Research Findings: National-Scale Distribution of Air Pollution in South Korea

“…The map of spatial distribution of air pollution concentrations also helps identify highly polluted areas and possible pollution sources, and initiates policy efforts to improve air quality in those areas. Data visualization also helps the communication between researchers and public audiences, by engaging people with the research data through the visualization's content and design [7]. Essential understanding is facilitated by using various charts of familiar types to public (e.g., bar, line, and scatter plots) and maps of static or interactive features [7].…”

A picture is not always worth a thousand words: The visual quality of photographs affects the effectiveness of interpretive signage for science communication

“…Visualisation is associated with observers’ visual attention, emotional responses, understanding and recall of knowledge (Allen, 2018; Houts et al, 2006; Silvia, 2005). Our study’s findings not only confirm the above relationships empirically within the context of science communication in national parks, but also emphasise the importance of visual quality of the images used for science communication.…”

Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis

“…Finally, the strong emphasis on visualisations within research weaving can greatly aid researchers to rapidly digest the rich information that studies and citations contain. Such visualisations are likely to help not only researchers within and outside the field (thereby facilitating inter-disciplinary collaborations), but also members of the public (where applicable, stakeholders and policymakers), enhancing science communication and the public understanding of science [57].…”