2019
DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab22e2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Binary Stars with Partially Missing Data: Introducing Multiple Imputation in Astrometric Analysis

Abstract: Partial measurements of relative position are a relatively common event during the observation of visual binary stars. However, these observations are typically discarded when estimating the orbit of a visual pair. In this article we present a novel framework to characterize the orbits from a Bayesian standpoint, including partial observations of relative position as an input for the estimation of orbital parameters. Our aim is to formally incorporate the information contained in those partial measurements in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The orbits have been computed using our MCMC code, duly described in Mendez et al (2017) and Claveria et al (2019). The quality of our final orbital elements is variable, ranging from tentative to good quality, depending on orbital coverage and overall data quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The orbits have been computed using our MCMC code, duly described in Mendez et al (2017) and Claveria et al (2019). The quality of our final orbital elements is variable, ranging from tentative to good quality, depending on orbital coverage and overall data quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our orbital calculations we have used a Bayesian MCMC orbital code with dimensionality reduction, whose implementation is described in detail in Mendez et al (2017) and Claveria et al (2019). The main motivation behind this approach is to exploit features that are inherent to these methods, namely (i) to provide realistic confidence limits to the derived orbital elements, and (ii) to generate posterior probability density functions (PDF hereafter) for each orbital element, as well as for the derived masses.…”
Section: Orbital Elements For the Visual Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, for those of our graduates who pursue an academic career, the MSc thesis provides a fertile environment for theoretical research, where students join PhD students and postdocs to work under the close supervision of their mentors and, in most cases, successfully publish their findings (see, e.g., [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]).…”
Section: F Early Research Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%

Data Science for Engineers: A Teaching Ecosystem

Tobar,
Bravo-Marquez,
Dunstan
et al. 2021
Preprint
Self Cite
“…A good starting point for systematic surveys to determine stellar masses are all-sky catalogues which include identification of confirmed or suspected visual binaries, such as the Hipparcos catalogue (Lindegren et al 1997), as well as the more recent Gaia discoveries (Kervella et al 2019;El-Badry et al 2021;Brandt 2021); or spectroscopic binaries, such as the Geneva-Copenhagen spectroscopic survey (Nordström et al 2004). To this end, in 2014 we initiated a systematic campaign to complete or improve the observation of southern binaries from mainly the above catalogues (Mendez et al 2018), using the high-speed speckle camera HRCAM at the SOAR 4.1m telescope (Tokovinin & Cantarutti 2008;Tokovinin 2018); several publications have resulted from this effort, Gomez et al (2016); Mendez et al (2017); Claveria et al (2019); Docobo et al (2019); Mendez et al (2021); Villegas et al (2021); Gómez et al (2021). Considering that metal-poor binary systems are typically farther away and therefore fainter and/or more compact spatially, making them difficult objects for optical interferometry with 4m or smaller telescopes, in 2019 we also started a 1 Usually found only on young stars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%