1995
DOI: 10.1080/01688639508405156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual attention and perception in patients with Huntington's disease: Comparisons with other subcortical and cortical dementias

Abstract: Shifts in attention were examined in patients with Huntington's disease (HD) using a divided attention paradigm that involved the presentation of global-local stimuli. The HD patients' pattern of performance was compared to the previously reported results of groups of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD; Filoteo et al., 1992) or Parkinson's disease (PD; Filoteo et al., 1994). Across consecutive trials of the divided attention task, a visual target could appear at either the same global-local level or at a di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
40
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that abnormalities observed in HD are manifestations of the pathological process of the illness. HD patients have shown deficits in engaging attention [21] and our findings in HD patients are in agreement with these results [21]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests that abnormalities observed in HD are manifestations of the pathological process of the illness. HD patients have shown deficits in engaging attention [21] and our findings in HD patients are in agreement with these results [21]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Posner and Petersen postulated three types of operations involved in visual attention: disengaging, shifting and engaging [18]. These have been studied in AD and Huntington’s disease (HD) [19,20,21]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One method of examining such intra-stimulus attentional shifts has been to present participants with global-local stimuli (e.g., a large "S" made up from smaller "E"s; see Figure 1) on two consecutive stimulus presentations and determine their speed in identifying a target on the second stimulus presentation under two different conditions: (1) when the target stays at the same globallocal level on the two consecutive stimulus presentations (e.g., the target is at the global level on the first trial and remains at the global level across the two stimulus presentations); and (2) when the target changes levels on the two consecutive trials (e.g., the target was at the global level on the first trial and changed to the local level on the second trial). Previous studies have indicated that normal participants are significantly faster at identifying a target on the second stimulus presentation if it appears at the same global-local level on two consecutive presentations compared to when the target changes global-local levels across the two presentations (Filoteo et al, 1992(Filoteo et al, , 1994(Filoteo et al, , 1995Lamb & Yund, 1996;Robertson, 1996;Ward, 1982). This level-shifting effect suggests that some sort of facilitation for target identification occurs if the target appears at the recently attended global-local level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Finally, they are more prone to interference in the presence of a distractor stimulus compared with normal controls, as measured on a dichotic listening task (Sharpe, 1992). Moreover, several behavioral studies indicate that parkinsonian patients with overall well-preserved cognitive functions may nevertheless be impaired at a variety of visual attention tasks (Filoteo et al, 1995;Wright, Burns, Geffen, & Geffen, 1990;Yamada, Izyuuinn, Schulzer, & Hirayama, 1990) and more specifically at tasks tapping selective attention mechanisms (Cools, Rogers, Barker, & Robbins, 2009;Henik, Singh, Beckley, & Rafal, 1993;Pillon et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%