2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the limited literature on the small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond lenticule extraction techniques, all relevant articles were included in the review. Figures 1 to 3 were developed from summation and percentage data in several articles on small-incision lenticule extraction 2,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and LASIK [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] ; attempts were made to ensure uniformity in the preoperative refractive parameters and other potentially confounding variables. The significant disproportion of available published literature on each technique resulted in a significantly larger portion of LASIK patients (n Z 36 822) than small-incision lenticule extraction patients (n Z 1759).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the limited literature on the small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond lenticule extraction techniques, all relevant articles were included in the review. Figures 1 to 3 were developed from summation and percentage data in several articles on small-incision lenticule extraction 2,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and LASIK [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] ; attempts were made to ensure uniformity in the preoperative refractive parameters and other potentially confounding variables. The significant disproportion of available published literature on each technique resulted in a significantly larger portion of LASIK patients (n Z 36 822) than small-incision lenticule extraction patients (n Z 1759).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information was extracted from several studies. 2,11,12,14,[16][17][18][19][20][21]23 Sample sizes for each time period are as follows: 1 month, n Z 162; 3 months, n Z 958; 6 months, n Z 217; 1 year, n Z 73 (CDVA Z corrected distance visual acuity). a combination of keratectomy with subsequent excimer laser ablation was successfully performed, further refining the keratomileusis procedure.…”
Section: Historical Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small-incision lenticule extraction technology has shown excellent efficacy, safety, stability, and predictability in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. [6][7][8][9] Being flapfree, this approach might reduce some flap-related side effects of LASIK, such as flap dislocation, uneven flap edges, corneal ectasia, and flap-induced astigmatism. Small-incision lenticule extraction also differs from LASEK or PRK in that no epithelial scraping is needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The procedures were similar in terms of safety, efficacy, predictability and stability, suggesting that the presence or absence of lifting the flap does not significantly affect these visual and refractive outcomes. 17 Interestingly, the refractive predictability after SMILE has been found to be unrelated to the degree of the attempted myopic correction. 6 This is in contrast to excimer-based treatments, which show decreasing precision with increasing myopic correction.…”
Section: Refractive Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%