2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00345-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual and electrical evoked response recorded from subdural electrodes implanted above the visual cortex in normal dogs under two methods of anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has dramatically higher spatial resolution than EEG [i.e., tenths of millimeters vs centimeters (Freeman et al, 2003)], broader bandwidth (Staba et al, 2002), higher characteristic amplitude, and far less vulnerability to artifacts such as EMG (Freeman et al, 2003). At the same time, because ECoG does not require penetration of the cortex, it may have greater long-term stability than intracortical recordings (Loeb et al, 1977;Bullara et al, 1979;Yuen et al, 1987;Margalit et al, 2003).…”
Section: Ecog Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has dramatically higher spatial resolution than EEG [i.e., tenths of millimeters vs centimeters (Freeman et al, 2003)], broader bandwidth (Staba et al, 2002), higher characteristic amplitude, and far less vulnerability to artifacts such as EMG (Freeman et al, 2003). At the same time, because ECoG does not require penetration of the cortex, it may have greater long-term stability than intracortical recordings (Loeb et al, 1977;Bullara et al, 1979;Yuen et al, 1987;Margalit et al, 2003).…”
Section: Ecog Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECoG has higher spatial resolution than EEG (i.e., tenths of millimeters versus centimeters [8]), broader bandwidth (i.e., 0-200 Hz versus 0-40 Hz), higher amplitude (i.e., 50-100 µV maximum versus 10-20 µV), and far less vulnerability to artifacts such as EMG [8,9,15]. At the same time, because ECoG is recorded by subdural electrode arrays and thus does not require electrodes that penetrate into cortex, it is likely to have greater long-term stability and might also be safer than single-neuron recording [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECoG has higher spatial resolution than EEG (i.e., tenths of millimeters vs. centimeters [12]), broader bandwidth (i.e., 0-500 Hz [13] vs. 0-50 Hz), higher characteristic amplitude (i.e., 50-100 μV vs. 10-20 μV), and far less vulnerability to artifacts such as EMG [12] or ambient noise. At the same time, because ECoG does not require penetration of the cortex, it is likely to have greater long-term stability [14,15,16,17] and to produce less tissue damage and reaction than intracortical recordings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%