2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12371-011-0049-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visitor Understanding of the Geodiversity and the Geoconservation Value of the Giant’s Causeway World Heritage Site, Northern Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hose 2005; Hughes and Ballantyne 2010; Crawford and Black 2012). In the specific geographical context of the Pogórze Kaczawskie region, a range of challenges may be identified, particularly evident if the geomorphological component is to be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hose 2005; Hughes and Ballantyne 2010; Crawford and Black 2012). In the specific geographical context of the Pogórze Kaczawskie region, a range of challenges may be identified, particularly evident if the geomorphological component is to be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dating of underlying and overlying basalt allowed geoscientists to obtain insights into rates of weathering front descent and basalt alteration under humid and warm climatic conditions (Smith and McAlister 1987;Hill et al 2001). The presence of distinctively red inter-basaltic beds within otherwise dark basaltic cliffs is highlighted as one of the main features of interest at the site and elaborately explained, although Crawford and Black (2012) noted that visitors were not fully satisfied with the level of interpretation provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four papers investigate visitor perceptions of geoheritage in the study areas, five papers analyze the motivation of tourists to visit the study areas, two papers additionally investigate the connection between tourists' motivation and satisfaction [74], and between tourists' motivation and willingness to pay for guided tours [75]. Three papers [12,76,77] categorize visitors based on their attitudes and motivations, while two papers [78,79] investigate visitors' opinions on and understanding of geo-interpretation materials, and propose improvements.…”
Section: Research Trends In Geotourism Which Have Evolved Over the Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high proportion of the papers which focus on geotourism management examine volcanic and loess areas. based on their attitudes and motivations, while two papers [78,79] investigate visitors' opinions on and understanding of geo-interpretation materials, and propose improvements. Certain areas and geoheritage types receive greater attention from researchers due to their specific characteristics ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Research Trends In Geotourism Which Have Evolved Over the Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that geoconservation is an emerging geoscience with clear and deep social interrelation [12], which must be grounded in knowledge and methods developed in different sciences, thus approaching the social sciences of the natural sciences [10,25,38,46]. Such holistic vision must be taken into account not only in its scope, but also in its methods, including in inventory and evaluation procedures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%