2007
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20071239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visitor and community survey results for Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge: Completion report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the scale of this survey (estimated n > 10,000) and previous research on National Wildlife Refuges (Sexton, Stewart, Koontz, Ponds, & Walters, 2007;Sexton et al, 2005), an online option could reduce overall data collection and entry costs. An online-only option, however, was not appropriate for the target population since not all refuge visitors actively use the Internet, and certain demographics (e.g., lower income, rural residents) are less likely to have an e-mail account (International Telecommunications Union, 2010;Internet World Stats, 2010).…”
Section: Case Study 1: National Wildlife Refuge Visitor Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the scale of this survey (estimated n > 10,000) and previous research on National Wildlife Refuges (Sexton, Stewart, Koontz, Ponds, & Walters, 2007;Sexton et al, 2005), an online option could reduce overall data collection and entry costs. An online-only option, however, was not appropriate for the target population since not all refuge visitors actively use the Internet, and certain demographics (e.g., lower income, rural residents) are less likely to have an e-mail account (International Telecommunications Union, 2010;Internet World Stats, 2010).…”
Section: Case Study 1: National Wildlife Refuge Visitor Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%