1974
DOI: 10.2307/3317024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visiting Patterns among Women of the Elite in a Small Turkish City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(...) In contrast to the kabul günü, the gün of the middle-class women of eighties is a meeting of a steady group' (Wolbert 1996: 188). 7 For a thorough account of kabul günü meetings, see Benedict (1974), Aswad (1974), Lindisfarne (2001), and Özbay (1999). 8 Although Wolbert recognizes the difference between kabul günü and gün while she argues that the former is arranged by elite women and the latter is by middle-class women, she still considers the two forms of meeting as 'informally regulated practice of reciprocal visits' (Wolbert: 1996, 186).…”
Section: Gün As a Women's Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(...) In contrast to the kabul günü, the gün of the middle-class women of eighties is a meeting of a steady group' (Wolbert 1996: 188). 7 For a thorough account of kabul günü meetings, see Benedict (1974), Aswad (1974), Lindisfarne (2001), and Özbay (1999). 8 Although Wolbert recognizes the difference between kabul günü and gün while she argues that the former is arranged by elite women and the latter is by middle-class women, she still considers the two forms of meeting as 'informally regulated practice of reciprocal visits' (Wolbert: 1996, 186).…”
Section: Gün As a Women's Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guests stay about an hour in the house of the hostess where they are served food and drink, and as Benedict puts it, 'the room always appears full during a reception, and with the staggered found at such a gathering, it seems as if people are always coming and going' (Benedict 1974: 38). The patterns of attending to the kabul günü in the towns that Aswad (1974), Benedict (1974) and Lindisfarne (2001) refers to emphasize the already existing hierarchical bonds between the women in a certain area and remains a practice of elite women. In this regard, kabul günü in towns should be differentiated from gün associations in urban areas.…”
Section: Gün As a Women's Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elite families compete and form alliances across religious lines to gather and retain power. They utilize the same strategies found among all Middle Eastern local elites: participation in exclusive social networks which function as closed information circuits (seeAswad 1974) and intermarriage among themselves. The ethnically heterogeneous (Albanian, Arabic, Kurdish, Persian, and Turkish) grand families of Antakya, an agrocity of southeastern Turkey, have utilized two marriage patterns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women's leisure activities, such as reception days, formal teas, and other religious and formal gatherings, for instance, were a major focus of interest during the 1970s (Aswad 1967(Aswad , 1974(Aswad , 1978Benedict 1974), Iran (Good 1978), and Lebanon (Farsoun and Farsoun 1974). Such activities that were organised and attended by the elite women of the Middle East were seen as a venue of exchange and empowerment, and became a common focus of the early feminists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first wave in anthropology of the Middle East embodied the initial attempts and efforts to focus on women in the Muslim world with the goal of correcting the scholarship that mostly focused on men, reflecting the common tendencies of their time in emerging feminist studies (Aswad 1967(Aswad , 1974(Aswad , 1978Fallers and Fallers 1976;Fernea and Bezirgan 1977;Keddie 1979;Keddie and Beck 1978;Maher 1974;Makhlouf 1979;Tapper 1978;Vreede-de Stuers 1968). This wave corresponded to the emergence of an Banthropology of women^that tackled Bthe problem of how women were represented in anthropology^ (Moore 1988: 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%