Abstract:Background: Chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes place a large burden on the health care system and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A team-based multidisciplinary approach that organizes care to improve chronic disease management may actually decrease traditional continuity of care metrics. Visit entropy (VE) provides a novel measure of care organization produced by teambased approaches. Higher VE, reflecting more disorganized care, has been associated with more hospital readmissions… Show more
“…We also note that the approach we have used has potential applications for other fragmentation measures. For example, recent studies have examined “visit entropy” using a measure closely related to entropy statistics from population genetics that have been studied in a similar way to the analogues of UPC and COCI . Examining the mathematical relationship between UPC and visit entropy could further shed light on the distinct contributions of different measures and combinations of measures.…”
Objective
To identify novel properties of health care fragmentation measures, drawing on insights from mathematically equivalent measures of genetic diversity.
Study Design
We describe mathematical relationships between two measures: (a) Breslau's Usual Provider of Care (UPC), the proportion of care with the most frequently visited provider, analogous to the “frequency of the most frequent allele” at a genetic locus; and (b) Bice‐Boxerman's Continuity of Care Index (COCI), a measure of care dispersion across multiple providers, analogous to “Nei's estimator of homozygosity” in genetics.
Principal Findings
Just as the frequency of the most frequent allele places a tight constraint on homozygosity, the proportion of care with the most frequently visited provider (UPC) places lower and upper bounds on dispersion of care (COCI), and vice versa. This property presents the possibility of a normalized COCI given UPC (NCGU) measure, which reflects a bounded range of care dispersion dependent on the number of visits with the most frequently visited provider. Mathematical aspects of UPC and COCI also suggest thresholds for the minimal number of patient visits to use when studying fragmentation.
Conclusions
Applying knowledge from population genetics elucidated relationships between care fragmentation measures and produced novel insights for care fragmentation studies.
“…We also note that the approach we have used has potential applications for other fragmentation measures. For example, recent studies have examined “visit entropy” using a measure closely related to entropy statistics from population genetics that have been studied in a similar way to the analogues of UPC and COCI . Examining the mathematical relationship between UPC and visit entropy could further shed light on the distinct contributions of different measures and combinations of measures.…”
Objective
To identify novel properties of health care fragmentation measures, drawing on insights from mathematically equivalent measures of genetic diversity.
Study Design
We describe mathematical relationships between two measures: (a) Breslau's Usual Provider of Care (UPC), the proportion of care with the most frequently visited provider, analogous to the “frequency of the most frequent allele” at a genetic locus; and (b) Bice‐Boxerman's Continuity of Care Index (COCI), a measure of care dispersion across multiple providers, analogous to “Nei's estimator of homozygosity” in genetics.
Principal Findings
Just as the frequency of the most frequent allele places a tight constraint on homozygosity, the proportion of care with the most frequently visited provider (UPC) places lower and upper bounds on dispersion of care (COCI), and vice versa. This property presents the possibility of a normalized COCI given UPC (NCGU) measure, which reflects a bounded range of care dispersion dependent on the number of visits with the most frequently visited provider. Mathematical aspects of UPC and COCI also suggest thresholds for the minimal number of patient visits to use when studying fragmentation.
Conclusions
Applying knowledge from population genetics elucidated relationships between care fragmentation measures and produced novel insights for care fragmentation studies.
“…Put another way, disorganized care is as important as the history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or diabetes without end‐organ damage to hospital readmission risk. Likewise, Dilger et al showed, higher VE is associated with reduced odds of meeting diabetic quality metrics (OR = 0.88) 21 . Their study showed that a single unit increase in disorganized care (equivalent to seeing three different physicians vs seeing the same primary physician three times) as measured by VE produces a 47% lower probability of a controlled D5 metric (a1c < 8.0, blood pressure < 140/90, on statin, non‐smoker, on anti‐platelet agent).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, almost half of primary care patients do not visit their primary care physician's office in a given year 19 . This results in a division by zero error making the calculation of these indexes undefined, often resulting in the elimination of significant number of patients from studies 15,20,21 . The problem is worse for COC and SECON which require at least two visits.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, visit pattern H where the patient sees their primary physician four times has more continuity than visit pattern B or E where they only see their primary physician once or twice. COC is undefined for pattern B and does not distinguish between pattern H and pattern E. Thus, in a Patient‐centred medical home (PCMH) operating under the team‐based care recommended for chronic disease management by Brodenheimer et al, traditional continuity measures will be indistinguishable from situations with little organization of care and may be erroneously reduced 21‐23 …”
In 1948, W. Eugene Smith published "Country Doctor" in Life Magizine. 1 This landmark photo essay highlighted continuity of care in rural America by showing Dr Ceriani delivering babies, examining children, performing emergency surgery, and caring for the dying in Kremmling, Colorado. However, a half century of medical progress has brought us to a world filled with robotic surgery, MRI machines, DNA tests, electronic medical records, and handheld ultrasound devices that Dr Ceriani would barely recognize. Medical care has become more fragmented and specialized with an emphasis on convenience and care teams. 2-4 Despite these amazing medical advances, patients with chronic diseases still desire a relationship with their physician. 5-7 The Institute of Medicine defines continuity of care to be longitudinal care coupled with effective and timely communication of health information. 8 Continuity of care has been associated with lower mortality, fewer hospitalizations, fewer ED visits, improved preventative services, lower costs, decreased healthcare utilization, and improved patient satisfaction. 9-11 However, there is little agreement on an accepted measure of continuity of care. 12,13 Continuity of care measures have traditionally been classified into five categories that measure density of visits, dispersion of visits, sequence of visits, duration of relationships, and subjective patient
“…The other original research articles in this issue remind us that not all practice-based research takes place in PBRNs. Using EHR data from 5 practices, Dilger et al 16 posit that visit entropy is a better measure of care organization and is associated with better diabetic quality scores. And reporting on just a single practice, Morcos 17 presents compelling evidence for the importance of taking the blood pressure the right way in daily office practice, an oftenoverlooked component of quality care.…”
Section: Not All Practice-based Research Takes Place In Pbrnsmentioning
Primary care has changed in the past 40 years, and research performed within and by practice-based research networks (PBRN) needs to change to keep up with the current practice landscape. A key task for PBRNs is to connect with today's stakeholders, not only the traditional physicians, providers, office staff, and patients, but health systems, insurance companies, and government agencies. In addition to one-time externally funded engagement efforts, PBRNs must develop and report on sustainable, longterm strategies. PBRNs are also demonstrating how they use classic practice-based research techniques of practice facilitation and electronic health record (EHR) data extraction and reporting in new and important research areas, such as studying the opioid epidemic. PBRNs are adapting and transforming along with primary care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.