1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0361-3682(96)00024-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visions of Organization and Organizations of Vision: The Representational Practices of Information Systems Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, I want to emphasize that the utilization of this metaphor does not imply that I suggest that IT artifacts actually are (only) texts, but instead I suggest that interesting issues can be revealed while considering them as texts. Regarding existing research utilizing this metaphor, in some studies IT artifacts have already been perceived as texts and their reading analyzed to some extent; both representations of IT and representations inscribed in IT have been analyzed [8,10,24,56]. However, in this paper the reading of the IT artifact texts is not explored, since the focus is solely on the writing context.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, I want to emphasize that the utilization of this metaphor does not imply that I suggest that IT artifacts actually are (only) texts, but instead I suggest that interesting issues can be revealed while considering them as texts. Regarding existing research utilizing this metaphor, in some studies IT artifacts have already been perceived as texts and their reading analyzed to some extent; both representations of IT and representations inscribed in IT have been analyzed [8,10,24,56]. However, in this paper the reading of the IT artifact texts is not explored, since the focus is solely on the writing context.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in [8,24,54,56]). It is assumed that in IT artifact development texts (IT artifacts) are written (developed), after which they are read (used).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is appropriate to consider how best to provide data to explicate the manner in which technology takes over some of the decisions of human actors or affects the direction of groups in society or organisations. Clearly we cannot rely on what participants say since the whole issue of the impact of technological systems and inscriptions is their pervasive, rather than directly intrusive character (see Bloomfield and Verdubakis, 1997b for a discussion of "framing" devices). Latour (1994) argues that it is not possible to "study technical skill directly", that we are still concerned with "meaning but no longer in discourse"(p.39).…”
Section: Knorr Cetina Argues Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we have long been aware that representations can also been seen as much more active and constructive in relation to their referents. From this point of view, they are attempts at what Bloomfield and Vurdubakis (1997) have called 'worldmaking'. Writing in the context of organisational information systems, they argue that:…”
Section: Representation Of Users Citizens and Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These representations, and the practices that generate, manage and interpret them, are at the heart of our arguments. We contrast the formal 'grammar' of family relationships (Levi-Strauss, 1964), which has tended to inform attempts to instantiate family in services' information systems, with richer notions of representation as a collective achievement (Dourish, 2004), and one that not only describes aspects of the world but also actively makes those aspects thinkable (Bloomfield and Vurdubakis, 1997). Through this conceptual lens, we review some of the ways in which recent investments in complex information systems have shaped the capacity of public services to 'think family'.…”
Section: Introduction: Think Family!mentioning
confidence: 99%