Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3017680.3017755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visions of Computer Science Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our categorization scheme, these nodes are represented by corporate and sometimes nonprofit nodes. Rather than directly profit from CS Education, these entities often cite the desire for a large workforce pool of talented programmers (Vogel, Santo, & Ching, 2017). Corporate members of this node can be identified by name, such as the Intel Foundation, AOL, Microsoft, and so on.…”
Section: De/centralized Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our categorization scheme, these nodes are represented by corporate and sometimes nonprofit nodes. Rather than directly profit from CS Education, these entities often cite the desire for a large workforce pool of talented programmers (Vogel, Santo, & Ching, 2017). Corporate members of this node can be identified by name, such as the Intel Foundation, AOL, Microsoft, and so on.…”
Section: De/centralized Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…evolve as needed based on the diverse goals of stakeholders throughout NYC. Projects similar to CS Visions (Santo, Vogel, & Ching, 2019;Vogel et al, 2017), which engaged community members, researchers, teachers, curriculum developers, and government officials in discussing the goals and values at the heart of their efforts to bring CS to children throughout the city should be continued and expanded. In fact, while CS Visions was deployed by researchers connected to CSNYC, since the analysis carried out in this paper, it has been adopted by the national CSforAll effort (Santo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Pedagogical Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from broadening youth's participation in CT/CS education through computer science or computer literacy electives, this study took place in science classrooms, presenting another promising approach to increased access to computational experiences. Further, this approach broadened individuals' conceptions of what "counts" as computation, highlighting social, civic, and personal dimensions of a topic that can be dominated by economic, technological, literacy, and educational conversations [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational thinking (CT), or "solving problems, designing systems, and understanding human behavior, by drawing on the concepts fundamental to computer science" [1, p. 33], is now recognized as a foundational competency for K-12 learners, to address a variety of economic, social, literacy, civic, technological, educational, and personal needs [1][2][3]. CT in education, however, remains scarce in schools, in particular, in K-8 classrooms for multiple reasons.…”
Section: Integrating Computational Thinking Engineering Design and Environmental Science Through Smart Greenhousesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation