1961
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-196109000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vision Screening With a Snellen Chart

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data of Peters (1968), Malmquist (1965) and Robbins and Bailey (1975) are consistent with and explain why, current school vision screening programmes given by health departments in Australia detect only one-half of the defects that can be predicted and found by epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Pediatric Vision Problemssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data of Peters (1968), Malmquist (1965) and Robbins and Bailey (1975) are consistent with and explain why, current school vision screening programmes given by health departments in Australia detect only one-half of the defects that can be predicted and found by epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Pediatric Vision Problemssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Current screening techniques assume as a modus operandi that distance visual acuity is a valid index of total visual integrity. Peters (1968), Dean of the School of Optometry and Professor of Public Health in the Medical Centre, University of Alabama, showed this premise is invalid. He compared the visual performance attainable when visual defects considered clinically significant by optometrists and ophthalmologists are present with the visual performance necessary to reach acceptable levels of visual acuity on a Snellen chart.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Pediatric Vision Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants covered the eye not being tested. The best score for visual acuity was recorded for each eye using metric notation from the Snellen chart, where the numerator was ‘6 metres’ [15]. The denominators were based on the Snellen metric notation.…”
Section: Research Designs and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual acuity testing alone would have identified 55% of the defects including colour vision and visual acuity test plus cover test would identify only 68% of the total defects excluding colour vision. Peters (1961) in discussing vision screening with a Snellen chart i.e. visual acuity testing alone, states ' I .…”
Section: Comparison With Abbreviated Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%