2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10903-016-0489-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vision and Hearing Health Inequities in the Roma population: A National Cross-Sectional Study in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While in the field of communication, this risk proved to be reduced among Roma people. This result was also consistent with previously published results [45,46]. Self-sufficiency and community life showed no difference among Roma and non-Roma patients with chronic disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While in the field of communication, this risk proved to be reduced among Roma people. This result was also consistent with previously published results [45,46]. Self-sufficiency and community life showed no difference among Roma and non-Roma patients with chronic disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…At present, the clinical practice in podiatry is mainly private, and so access to foot care is largely governed by socioeconomic status. Similar conclusions have been reached regarding inequalities in the use of dental health services [43] [44] [45], in access to services related to oral health in England [46] and Sweden [47], hearing aids and visual problems [35], and in the acquisition of health care products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This is apparent in the causes of death. Still today, many Gitano families suffer from structural exclusionary processes that make them very vulnerable to diseases and disabilities (Latorre-Arteaga et al 2016) and which translate into an "extreme health inequality" (La Parra, Gil, and De la Torre 2016: 468). However, the high rates of infant and child mortality described in this paper are something of the past.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%