Water-soluble complexes cis-[Ru(bpy) 2 (PTA) 2 ]Cl 2 (1Cl 2 ), cis-[Ru(bpy) 2 (PTA) 2 ](PF 6 ) 2 [1(PF 6 ) 2 ], trans-[Ru(bpy) 2 (PTA) 2 ]-(CF 3 SO 3 ) 2 [2(CF 3 SO 3 ) 2 ], cis-[Ru(bpy) 2 (PTA)(H 2 O)](CF 3 SO 3 ) 2 [3(CF 3 SO 3 ) 2 ], cis-[Ru(bpy) 2 (PTAH)(H 2 O)](CF 3 SO 3 ) 3 ·2CF 3 SO 3 H [4(CF 3 SO 3 ) 3 ·2CF 3 SO 3 H], cis-[Ru(bpy) 2 (PTAH) 2 ](CF 3 SO 3 ) 4 · 4CF 3 SO 3 H [5(CF 3 SO 3 ) 4 ·4CF 3 SO 3 H], and trans-[Ru(bpy) 2 (PTAH) 2 ]-(CF 3 SO 3 ) 4 ·4CF 3 SO 3 H [6(CF 3 SO 3 ) 4 ·4CF 3 SO 3 H] (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl; PTA = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, NMR, and IR spectroscopy. The crystal structures of 1(PF 6 ) 2 , 2(CF 3 SO 3 ) 2 , and 3(CF 3 SO 3 ) 2 were obtained by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Both experimental and computational techniques were utilized to perform a detailed analysis of the structural and electronic [a] Computational Details: DFT calculations at the B3LYP [35,36] level of theory were carried out with the NWCHEM 6.3 software package. [37] A Gaussian basis set of 6-31g(d,p) was used for the ligands, whereas the effective core potential LAN2DZ set was used for the ruthenium atom. Structure optimization was carried out starting from the Cartesian coordinates of the crystal structures. The COSMO model was adopted to simulate solvent effects. [19] UV absorption spectra were calculated by using time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) and were obtained by convoluting the 70 lowest singlet excitation energies obtained from the Davidson solutions of the TD-DFT equations with a Gaussian distribution of FWHM = 30 nm. X-ray Structure Determination: Data for compounds were collected with a Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer (XDIFRACT service of the University of Almeria) by using graphite-monochromated Mo-K α radiation (λ = 0.7107 Å) at 150 K. The crystal parameters and other experimental details of the data collections are summarized in Table 3. The structures were solved by direct methods with SIR92, [38] refined by full-matrix least-squares methods with SHEL-XTL, [39] and refined by least-squares procedures on F 2 ; final geometrical calculations and graphical manipulations were carried out with the SHELXS-XTL package. [39] The non-hydrogen non-disordered atoms were refined with anisotropic atomic displacement parameters. All hydrogen atoms were included in calculated positions and refined by using a riding model. The quality of the resolution of