1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1982.tb00745.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visible light‐cured composite resins: polymerization contraction, contraction pattern and hygroscopic expansion

Abstract: – The wall‐to‐wall polymerization contraction and hygroscopic expansion of Durafill®, Heliosit®, Silux® and Visio‐Dispers® were examined in dendn cavities in extracted human teeth. The linear shrinkage varied from 0.24% to 0.63% and only two of the tested materials were able to close the marginal gap owing to water absorption. The gaps were nearly always broadest in the apical part of the fillings. Measurements of the marginal gaps were made at different levels between 100 and 1200 um below the free surface o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
51
0
11

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
51
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…in accordance with previous results (Hansen, 1982), the largest contraction was most often found in the apical area of the cavity, also when using techniques B and C. The rationale for testing two different oblique techniques was that placing the first increment in the coronal area would result in a small residual cavity in the apical area, where the largest contraction was most often found. The hypothesis was that this method would result in a more pronounced reduction of the apical contraction than if the first increment were placed apically, but no statistically-significant difference for marginal gap width was found betweeli the two oblique techniques (Fig.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…in accordance with previous results (Hansen, 1982), the largest contraction was most often found in the apical area of the cavity, also when using techniques B and C. The rationale for testing two different oblique techniques was that placing the first increment in the coronal area would result in a small residual cavity in the apical area, where the largest contraction was most often found. The hypothesis was that this method would result in a more pronounced reduction of the apical contraction than if the first increment were placed apically, but no statistically-significant difference for marginal gap width was found betweeli the two oblique techniques (Fig.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The method used has been described in detail in a previous paper (Hansen, 1982). Briefly, the procedures were as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, shrinkage in cavities is mainly influenced by adhesion, flow on the free surface, and local polymerization 5) . The location and orientation of the irradiating light are also important factors in improving cavity adaptation 16,17) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different factors have been suggested to affect the direction of polymerization shrinkage of the light-curing resin composite in clinical situations. These factors include cavity design (C-factor), the polymerization reaction rate, thickness, translucency and rheological properties of the resin composite and the intensity and direction of the light (Hansen, 1982;Hansen, 1986;Feilzer & others, 1987;Uno & Asmussen, 1991;Unterbrink & Muessner, 1995;Asmussen & Peutzfeldt, 1999). Interfacial bond strength was also considered a contributing factor in a theoretical finite element analysis (FEA) (Versluis, Tantbirojn & Douglas, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%