2003
DOI: 10.1177/0021934703253687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visible and Invisible Barriers to the Incorporation of Faculty of Color in Predominantly White Law Schools

Abstract: Despite efforts to diversify faculty in predominantly White institutions, most law schools remain predominantly male and Caucasian. Based heavily on aspects of Law Professor Derrick Bell's work and research, the author, a lawyer by training, explores the extent to which limited institutional support in law school environments cripples the chances of faculty of color in their efforts to succeed. The author also points out the mechanisms that scholars of color in law schools have used in an effort to combat raci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These barriers include discrimination and bias by those in authority (Acker, 1990; Baron & Bielby, 1986;Kanter, 1977;Reskin, 2000); lack of mentoring (Blake-Beard, 2001;Essien, 2003;Martin, 1994); exclusion from social and informational networks (Essien, 2003;McGuire, 2002;Smith-Lovin & McPherson, 1993); and uneven distribution of low-status assignments (Essien, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These barriers include discrimination and bias by those in authority (Acker, 1990; Baron & Bielby, 1986;Kanter, 1977;Reskin, 2000); lack of mentoring (Blake-Beard, 2001;Essien, 2003;Martin, 1994); exclusion from social and informational networks (Essien, 2003;McGuire, 2002;Smith-Lovin & McPherson, 1993); and uneven distribution of low-status assignments (Essien, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question remains if this trend will drive changes in institutional practices that will not allow for hiring diverse faculty to meet a quota but with limited power to impact change, limited voice. Chun & Evans (2008) call this type of marginalization the new context of discrimination, subtle, cumulative with limited participation in decision making and limited access to resources and support for promotion (Essien, 2003). Therefore, efforts to eliminate exclusion, marginalization, and limited voice in decision making are imperative if we want to retain diverse faculty in higher education.…”
Section: What Are the Challenges?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bernier (2000) as quoted inEssien (2003).Downloaded by [Georgetown University] at 02:06 15 June 2016…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%