The fragility ͑the abnormally strong temperature dependence of the viscosity͒ of highly viscous liquids is shown to have two sources. The first is the temperature dependence of the barriers between inherent states considered earlier. The second is the recently discovered asymmetry between the actual inherent state and its neighbors. One needs both terms for a quantitative description. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.172201 PACS number͑s͒: 64.70.QϪ, 77.22.Gm Though there is as yet no generally accepted explanation of the flow in highly viscous liquids, 1-3 it seems clear that its description requires the passage of high-energy barriers between inherent states, i.e., local structural minima of the potential energy. 4 According to the elastic models, 2 the fragility stems from a proportionality of the height V of these barriers to the infinite-frequency shear modulus G, which in the highly viscous liquid decreases strongly with temperature.The present Brief Report shows that this is only part of the truth. There is a second source of fragility in the newly discovered 5 asymmetry of about 4k B T between the actual inherent state and its neighbors, possibly due 6 to the elastic distortion accompanying a structural rearrangement ͑the "Eshelby backstress" 7 ͒. As will be seen, the quantitative explanation of the fragility of six different glass formers requires just this specific explanation of the asymmetry.The usual measure of the fragility of a glass former is the logarithmic slope of the relaxation time ␣ of the flow process,where the glass temperature T g is defined as the temperature with ␣ = 1000 s. It is useful to relate ␣ to a critical barrier V c via the Arrhenius relationwhere the microscopic attempt frequency is at 10 −13 s, 16 decades faster than the flow process at the glass temperature.The fragility index I is defined 2 by the logarithmic derivativewhere the factor reflects the sixteen decades between microscopic and macroscopic time scales. I is a better measure of the fragility than m because it does not contain the trivial temperature dependence of any thermally activated process. The elastic models 2 postulate a proportionality between the flow barrier V c and the infinite-frequency shear modulus G. One can again define a dimensionless measure ⌫ for the temperature dependence of G in terms of the logarithmic derivative ⌫ =−d ln G / d ln T at T g . Then the elastic models 2 postulate I = ⌫.In order to check this relation, one needs measurements of both quantities. The flow relaxation time ␣ is relatively easy to measure but the determination of the high-frequency shear modulus is by no means trivial. It requires the measurement of the density and the high-frequency transverse sound velocity v t . Consequently, the logarithmic derivative ⌫ is a sum of two terms, a larger one from the sound velocity and a smaller one from the density.In a liquid, well-defined transverse sound waves do only exist at frequencies which are markedly higher than the inverse 1 / ␣ of the flow relaxation time. With increasing tem...