2005
DOI: 10.1142/s1363246905002365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscous Damping in Seismic Design and Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
96
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the NTHA, in agreement with the computation of the CMS and response spectra from the selected records, viscous damping ratio was assumed as 5% (x=0.05). A tangent stiffness proportional damping model has been adopted, which has been found superior to Rayleigh damping and initial stiffness proportional damping for SDOF systems [27]. In this section, the results are presented, for each ground motion record and each return period, in terms of the lateral displacement profiles or rotations at the base of the piers, estimated with: (i) the four GPA versions; (ii) the alternative nonlinear static procedure (CSM); and (iii) nonlinear time history analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the NTHA, in agreement with the computation of the CMS and response spectra from the selected records, viscous damping ratio was assumed as 5% (x=0.05). A tangent stiffness proportional damping model has been adopted, which has been found superior to Rayleigh damping and initial stiffness proportional damping for SDOF systems [27]. In this section, the results are presented, for each ground motion record and each return period, in terms of the lateral displacement profiles or rotations at the base of the piers, estimated with: (i) the four GPA versions; (ii) the alternative nonlinear static procedure (CSM); and (iii) nonlinear time history analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Displacement-dependent dampers, which have been investigated for earthquake mitigation [16,34], are mem-dashpots. A general form is:…”
Section: Appendix 1 For Sectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, according to [12,14,15,16,18,39,40,42], the Tstub bolted joint mechanical idealization was assumed to reproduce the hysteresis behavior, as a partially restrained connection. Accordingly to the Grant and Priestley paradigm [41], when considering the tangent stiffness-proportional Rayleigh damping, the stiffness-proportional matrix multiplying coefficient used to perform nonlinear dynamic analyses was correlated to the damping ratio associated to the fundamental period of the structure [38,41,42,43]. …”
Section: Fibre-based Modelling Approach For Mrf Structurementioning
confidence: 99%