2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscosity models for pure hydrocarbons at extreme conditions: A review and comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 261 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…D ρ drops upon isothermal compression above the critical P 54 . More sophisticated models for predicting the self-diffusion coefficient (and viscosity) of fluids have been developed over the last four decades 55 – 57 ; reviewing them falls beyond the scope of the present work. The popular simple relation D η / ρ 1/3 = constant, which is a modification of the Stokes–Einstein–Sutherland relation without a hydrodynamic diameter 51 , does not describe well our experimental results along the 300 K isotherm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D ρ drops upon isothermal compression above the critical P 54 . More sophisticated models for predicting the self-diffusion coefficient (and viscosity) of fluids have been developed over the last four decades 55 – 57 ; reviewing them falls beyond the scope of the present work. The popular simple relation D η / ρ 1/3 = constant, which is a modification of the Stokes–Einstein–Sutherland relation without a hydrodynamic diameter 51 , does not describe well our experimental results along the 300 K isotherm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature is centered around semi-empirical expressions based on parameters such as the free volume that are not uniquely defined for real atoms and molecules, and viscosity data have typically been fitted to empirical polynomial expressions not obviously linked to the underlying physics. [1][2][3][4][5] The density and temperature ranges where they are applicable are also limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent work by Baled et al 54 compares the performance of several viscosity models available for hydrocarbons. These authors report that empirical models, such as the Lohrenz et al, 55 are not recommended for high-pressure viscosity calculations due to the lack of predictability of the parameters needed in the models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%