1972
DOI: 10.2475/ajs.272.9.870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscosities of magmatic silicate liquids; an empirical method of prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
542
4
8

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 958 publications
(567 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
542
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…At high viscosity ratios, finger-like patterns are generated and they usually enhance mixing processes between the lowviscosity mafic magma and the high-viscosity felsic magma. The viscosity ratio for the two interacting magmas in the proposed model has been calculated assuming different crystal percentages and pressure of 2000 MPa (Shaw, 1972;Bottinga & Weil, 1972). Under the worst conditions, that is, with a crystalfree mafic magma and 50 % crystallized felsic magma, the viscosity ratio is only about 3 × 10 2 .…”
Section: A Qmzdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high viscosity ratios, finger-like patterns are generated and they usually enhance mixing processes between the lowviscosity mafic magma and the high-viscosity felsic magma. The viscosity ratio for the two interacting magmas in the proposed model has been calculated assuming different crystal percentages and pressure of 2000 MPa (Shaw, 1972;Bottinga & Weil, 1972). Under the worst conditions, that is, with a crystalfree mafic magma and 50 % crystallized felsic magma, the viscosity ratio is only about 3 × 10 2 .…”
Section: A Qmzdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melt viscosities were calculated for reported rock compositions from the CY-1/1A drill holes, using the method of Shaw [23] (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Viscosity Of the Cy-1/1a Lavasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-eruptive apparent viscosities of the four analysed samples were between log 10 5.37 Pa.s and log 10 10.02 Pa.s, after Giordano et al (2006) and between log 10 4.81 Pa.s and log 10 8.27 Pa.s, after Shaw (1972). Including the effect of the phenocrysts gave effective viscosities between log 10 5.0 Pa.s and log 10 8.57 Pa.s.…”
Section: Viscosity Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 75%