2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2015.0289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscoelasticity and shear wave velocity of liver tissue evaluated by dynamic mechanical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the classical models did not provide an adequate fit to the stress relaxation data and were not able to represent the behaviour of the phantom during mechanical tests. The results of this study are in line with previous research that indicated that the simplicity of classical models does not adequately represent stressrelaxation behaviours (Murakami et al 2015, Poul et al 2022. Our results on the superiority of fractional derivative models for mechanical validation are in line with several studies using the stress-relaxation test utilising FD models (Zvietcovichet al 2017, Parker et al 2018.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the classical models did not provide an adequate fit to the stress relaxation data and were not able to represent the behaviour of the phantom during mechanical tests. The results of this study are in line with previous research that indicated that the simplicity of classical models does not adequately represent stressrelaxation behaviours (Murakami et al 2015, Poul et al 2022. Our results on the superiority of fractional derivative models for mechanical validation are in line with several studies using the stress-relaxation test utilising FD models (Zvietcovichet al 2017, Parker et al 2018.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the differences found between the estimated parameters in the time and frequency domains can be explained by the dependency of the stress-relaxation tests. The results of these tests depend on the initial indentation rate and are sensitive to the loading process (Murakami et al 2015, Negishi et al 2020. Therefore, future mechanical tests that better replicate soft tissue deformation during weight-bearing activities of daily living may be more useful (Naemi and Chockalingam 2013, Behforootan et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, sample effects represented random effects while species and log-transformed frequency were the fixed effects. The statistical models presented in this study can also be adopted to analyze the rheological data of phonosurgical biomaterials or other viscoelastic soft tissues such as liver (Kiss et al, 2004; Murakami et al, 2015; Nightingale et al, 2015), bladder (Barnes et al, 2015) and brain (Clayton et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%