1999
DOI: 10.1557/proc-594-251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscoelastic Behavior of Polymer Films During Scratch Test: a Quantitative Analysis

Abstract: Dynamic properties of polymer surfaces affect their ability to withstand abrasive actions. Kinetic conditions, like velocity, penetration depth and shape of the abrasive particles, change the abrasion mechanisms and the morphology of the abraded surface. Using the scratch technique, along with profilometry measurement across the scratches, we have been able to completely characterize the residual scratch morphology. Pile-up deformation and visco-plastic relaxation are key phenomena that characterize the import… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the scratch resistance of selected polymers (PS, 0.43 and 0.87 mol % Zr6 ) was tested for deeper insights to materials behavior. The definition of scratch resistance varies for certain applications, and materials can show different scratch behavior although the hardness is the same 77. Such behavior was observed in the cluster doped samples (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, the scratch resistance of selected polymers (PS, 0.43 and 0.87 mol % Zr6 ) was tested for deeper insights to materials behavior. The definition of scratch resistance varies for certain applications, and materials can show different scratch behavior although the hardness is the same 77. Such behavior was observed in the cluster doped samples (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…[28][29][30][31] Scanning probe microscopy instruments, such as the atomic force microscope, [32][33][34] have also been adopted and improvised by researchers to perform scratch tests at a nanometer scale. For evaluating the scratch surface and subsurface, researchers have used equipment like the optical microscope (OM), 18,24,26 atomic force microscope, 24,26,32,[35][36][37][38] scanning electron microscope, 14,15,26,39,40 X-ray photoelectron spectroscope, 41 laser confocal microscope, 18 Raman spectroscope, 28 white-light interferometer, 20,24 profilometer, 14,15,42 tribometer, 43 ellipsometer, 28 and scanner. 17,44,45 A review of the scratch test devices available for macroscopic testing 46 readily reveals that the ranges of normal loads and scratch rates for most devices are rather limited, while some of them may only be good for the evaluation of marred surfaces and, thus, insufficient for the scratch studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar study on polycarbonate, Jardret et al have observed distinctly different pile-up formations on nanoscratch samples of identical hardness. The difference in pileup height is attributed to the strain, with increased rim heights for larger strains, i.e larger tanβ [114]. With a 2D finite element approach, Ramond-Angélélis has modeled piled-up rim formation in viscoelastic-perfectly plastic materials as a function of the rheological factor X.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%