2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.19.20233437
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 can be partially shielded from UV radiation when in particles generated by sneezing or coughing: Numerical simulations

Abstract: UV radiation can inactivate viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. However, designing effective UV germicidal irradiation (UVGI) systems can be difficult because the effects of dried respiratory droplets and other fomites on UV light intensities are poorly understood. Numerical modeling of UV intensities inside virus-containing particles on surfaces can increase understanding of these possible reductions in UV intensity. We model UV intensities within spherical approximations of virions randomly positioned within spheric… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low-cost germicidal UV-C bulbs have been suggested to be installed in higher areas of the room for better air mixing, as their irradiance ranging from 28 - 80 µW cm −2 are likely to reduce 88% airborne SARS-CoV-2 transmissivity within 16 seconds ( Beggs and Avital, 2020 ; Davidson, 2021 ; Nardell 2020; Volchenkov, 2021 ). Even though UV is effective to disinfect indoor air from SARS-CoV-2, its application is recommended in all possible directions to reduce potential infectivity from shielded particles ( Doughty et al, 2021 ; Hill et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, a preprint by Mahammedi and Mahammedi (2020) proposed a solar powered UV mobile disinfectant which can be individualised to specific regions and scales.…”
Section: Indoor Airmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-cost germicidal UV-C bulbs have been suggested to be installed in higher areas of the room for better air mixing, as their irradiance ranging from 28 - 80 µW cm −2 are likely to reduce 88% airborne SARS-CoV-2 transmissivity within 16 seconds ( Beggs and Avital, 2020 ; Davidson, 2021 ; Nardell 2020; Volchenkov, 2021 ). Even though UV is effective to disinfect indoor air from SARS-CoV-2, its application is recommended in all possible directions to reduce potential infectivity from shielded particles ( Doughty et al, 2021 ; Hill et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, a preprint by Mahammedi and Mahammedi (2020) proposed a solar powered UV mobile disinfectant which can be individualised to specific regions and scales.…”
Section: Indoor Airmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper µ is set to 0 since the UV air absorbance can be considered negligible [70, 71]. Also the possible light refraction by the aerosol particles, which would vary the rays path, has not been considered for simplicity, since its effect is quite small when considering air respect to surfaces [72]. The single ray contribution to the volumetric power density p V is: …”
Section: Optical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the SARS-Cov 2 doses are given for plate measurements. Air sanification could be more effective since light arrives from all directions and also the shading or shielding effects that produce the tail on the lower end of the typical survival fraction curve, which limits higher log inactivation, could disappear [16, 72]. Results from Table 2 point out the directions for the most effective filters, respect to the reference case: high reflectivity, small cavity diameter, optimized source emission angle and longer cavity length.…”
Section: Filter Sanification Performancementioning
confidence: 99%