1961
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5264.1382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viruses Isolated from Natural Common Colds in the U.S.A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…RSV infection in an adult was noted 40 years ago by Beem et al [31]. One year later, in 1961, Hamre and Procknow [32] reported the recovery of RSV isolates from 15 medical students; these isolates accounted for 4% of all isolates collected during a 4-year period [33]. Berglund [37] and, by virus isolation, in 5 adult members in families in Tecumseh, Michigan, who were studied by Monto and Cavallaro [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…RSV infection in an adult was noted 40 years ago by Beem et al [31]. One year later, in 1961, Hamre and Procknow [32] reported the recovery of RSV isolates from 15 medical students; these isolates accounted for 4% of all isolates collected during a 4-year period [33]. Berglund [37] and, by virus isolation, in 5 adult members in families in Tecumseh, Michigan, who were studied by Monto and Cavallaro [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Had there been more specimens from general practice, and an even larger number from very mild respiratory infections, the isolation rate would have been nearer 30% (Kendall et al, 1962 ;Hamre andProcknow, 1963 Higgins et al, 1963).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several instances, virus was isolated from subjects with a respiratory illness and yet there was no evidence of an antibody response by any of the three serological techniques. This has been observed in natural and experimental infections with respiratory syncytial virus (Chanock, Kim, Vargosko, Deleva, Johnson, Cumming & Parrott, 1961;Kravetz, Knight, Chanock, Morris, Johnson, Rifkind & Utz, 1961;Hamre & Procknow, 1961) and in natural infections with para-influenza viruses (Chanock, Bell &Parrott, 1961). This stresses the point that a diagnosis of infection may have to be made on the evidence of virus isolation alone without an accompanying homotypic antibody response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%