2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098263
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus versus Host Plant MicroRNAs: Who Determines the Outcome of the Interaction?

Abstract: Considering the importance of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the regulation of essential processes in plant pathogen interactions, it is not surprising that, while plant miRNA sequences counteract viral attack via antiviral RNA silencing, viruses in turn have developed antihost defense mechanisms blocking these RNA silencing pathways and establish a counter-defense. In the current study, computational and stem-loop Reverse Transcription – Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) approaches were employed to a) predict and val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(176 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering these facts, the genome of geminiviruses could be examined for its miRNA coding potential because geminiviruses enter the plant nucleus. Interestingly, the expression of viral derived miRNAs has been demonstrated during the infection of African cassava mosaic virus and East African cassava mosaic virus—Uganda [ 67 ]. Hence, the proof of miRNA coding potential and functional miRNAs from the genomes of a geminivirus raises questions as to who determines the outcome of the host-geminivirus interactions in the sRNA interface [ 67 ].…”
Section: Geminivirus and Small Non-coding Rnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering these facts, the genome of geminiviruses could be examined for its miRNA coding potential because geminiviruses enter the plant nucleus. Interestingly, the expression of viral derived miRNAs has been demonstrated during the infection of African cassava mosaic virus and East African cassava mosaic virus—Uganda [ 67 ]. Hence, the proof of miRNA coding potential and functional miRNAs from the genomes of a geminivirus raises questions as to who determines the outcome of the host-geminivirus interactions in the sRNA interface [ 67 ].…”
Section: Geminivirus and Small Non-coding Rnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA-seq–based transcriptome scrutiny fastens the process of understanding plant systems in terms of biotic or abiotic stress, including virus infection, at the molecular level 16 . The mechanism of miRNA interaction between a virus and host plant was reported for various plant species including Jatropha 17 . The next-generation sequencing approaches substantially increase the quantity and quality of data on miRNA targets and their functional annotations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the proposed framework for various datasets, we contemplated two differential conditions of Jatropha. Various viral, fungal, and bacterial infections reduce the global average yield of J. curcas by 16% yearly 28 , the majority of which results from the occurrence of J. curcas mosaic virus, which causes leaf curling and reduction in fruit size 17 . Therefore, we considered the virus-infected (JV) tissue as one of the differential conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of invasive pathogens such as viroid and/or viruses that inject their genomes into the host plant [50,51]. Moreover and most likely, through evolutionary forces, genomes may have lost their corresponding target sites.Hundreds of thousands of hairpin structure in a genome exist that many of them appear to be derived from repeats, transposable elements and transposable inverted repeats as well as other evolving mechanisms that have the potential to form extremely stable miRNA like hairpin structure.…”
Section: Prediction Of Targets For Identified Mirnasmentioning
confidence: 99%