2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.04.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus reduction through microfiltration membranes modified with a cationic polymer for drinking water applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this only considers separation by sieving mechanisms. Sinclair et al [ 161 ] modified a microfiltration membranes using a cationic polymer. They reached a 3 log 10 MS2 reduction with the resulting membrane with only 22 % reduction in flux.…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment For Virus Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this only considers separation by sieving mechanisms. Sinclair et al [ 161 ] modified a microfiltration membranes using a cationic polymer. They reached a 3 log 10 MS2 reduction with the resulting membrane with only 22 % reduction in flux.…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment For Virus Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyethyleneimine (PEI) is one of the most studied amine-containing polymers in the field of antimicrobial polymers. For example, Vos et al studied the antiviral effect of branched (PEI) coating over polyether sulphone (PES) membrane [ 95 ]. PEI coating led to an increase of -units (99.9%) in MS2 Bacteriophages hosting strain Salmonella Typhimurium WG49 reduction on the membrane surface.…”
Section: Polymers For Antiviral Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reprinted from Sinclair TR, Robles D, Raza B, van den Hengel S, Rutjes SA, de Roda Husman AM, et al Virus reduction through microfiltration membranes modified with a cationic polymer for drinking water applications. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 2018;551:33-41, Copyright (2018), with permission from Elsevier[95].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibacterial activity is usually attributed to electrostatic interactions between cations and the negatively charged membrane surface of bacteria and/or to other interactions between the cations and the bacteria’s RNA/DNA proteins [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. As a result, antibacterial coatings usually contain positively charged materials in the form of either small molecules (mostly metal ions such as copper [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], silver [ 17 , 18 , 21 ], zinc [ 21 , 23 , 24 ], cobalt [ 25 ], nickel [ 26 ] or polyoxometalates [ 27 , 28 ]), nanoparticles (such as silver-based nanoparticles [ 15 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], rubidium-silver-titanium oxide nanocomposites [ 32 ], phenol-based nanoparticles [ 33 ] or silica-based nanoparticles [ 31 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]) or polymeric (such as chitosan/chitin [ 38 , 39 ], modified poly(ethylene imine) [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ], quaternary ammonium containing polymers [ 44 , 45 , 46 ,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%