2020
DOI: 10.3390/v12010107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus Metagenomics in Farm Animals: A Systematic Review

Abstract: A majority of emerging infectious diseases are of zoonotic origin. Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) has been employed to identify uncommon and novel infectious etiologies and characterize virus diversity in human, animal, and environmental samples. Here, we systematically reviewed studies that performed viral mNGS in common livestock (cattle, small ruminants, poultry, and pigs). We identified 2481 records and 120 records were ultimately included after a first and second screening. Pigs were the mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We deliberately focused on bacteria, which are dominant members of the ecosystem. This is not a sign of neglecting other microbes and viruses in the pig intestine [88][89][90][91][92] , but rather that the diversity of microbes to be catalogued is tremendous and that the required cultivation efforts are colossal if not tailored. As in recently published studies [93][94][95] , in order to capture as much diversity as possible, we employed an array of rich and selective culture media (see listing and composition in the previous section) in combination with samples from different gut locations (albeit mostly faeces) and pigs of various origins (most of the pigs were from one animal facility in Germany; others originated from two facilities in the USA or were wild boars from a farm in Canada; see detailed listing in Supplementary Data 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We deliberately focused on bacteria, which are dominant members of the ecosystem. This is not a sign of neglecting other microbes and viruses in the pig intestine [88][89][90][91][92] , but rather that the diversity of microbes to be catalogued is tremendous and that the required cultivation efforts are colossal if not tailored. As in recently published studies [93][94][95] , in order to capture as much diversity as possible, we employed an array of rich and selective culture media (see listing and composition in the previous section) in combination with samples from different gut locations (albeit mostly faeces) and pigs of various origins (most of the pigs were from one animal facility in Germany; others originated from two facilities in the USA or were wild boars from a farm in Canada; see detailed listing in Supplementary Data 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we wanted to determine the virus diversity, its abundance and seasonal variation in wild Australian ducks. As parvoviruses and picornaviruses were the most abundant and most often detected viruses 25 , 26 , we will here focus only on the results for these viruses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these viruses are bacteriophages. Although the bacteriophage communities (viromes) of vertebrates are much better studied (reviewed in Letarov and Kulikov 2009; Shkoporov 2019; Kwok et al 2020), some data are also available for invertebrates. These include the viral communities associated with the cnidarian Hydra (Grasis et al 2014; Bosch et al 2015) and certain scleractinian corals (Weynberg et al 2017; Mahmoud and Jose 2017), which have been recently characterized using metagenomic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%