2020
DOI: 10.1002/bit.27470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus harvesting in perfusion culture: Choosing the right type of hollow fiber membrane

Abstract: The use of bioreactors coupled to membrane‐based perfusion systems enables very high cell and product concentrations in vaccine and viral vector manufacturing. Many virus particles, however, are not stable and either lose their infectivity or physically degrade resulting in significant product losses if not harvested continuously. Even hollow fiber membranes with a nominal pore size of 0.2 µm can retain much smaller virions within a bioreactor. Here, we report on a systematic study to characterize structural a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3b–d ). For the used HFM, it is well established that virus particles of about 40–100 nm in diameter cannot pass through the membrane (Nikolay et al 2020 ). Samples taken shortly before harvesting confirmed this, since only residual virus amounts could be detected in the permeate line (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b–d ). For the used HFM, it is well established that virus particles of about 40–100 nm in diameter cannot pass through the membrane (Nikolay et al 2020 ). Samples taken shortly before harvesting confirmed this, since only residual virus amounts could be detected in the permeate line (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b–d). For the used HFM it is well established that virus particles of about 40-100 nm in diameter cannot pass through the membrane (Nikolay et al 2020). Samples taken shortly before harvesting confirmed this, since only residual virus amounts could be detected in the permeate line (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies investigated different HFMs for their potential to allow continuous virus harvesting (Genzel et al 2014; Nikolay et al 2020). However, almost all tested membranes completely retained the produced virus particles, despite the nominal pore size reported was much larger than the virus diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, product retention had already been observed for virus and VLP production when typical polyethersulfone ATF cartridges with 0.2 μm pore size and 0.13 m 2 filtration area were used (Alvim et al, 2019; Coronel et al, 2019; Lavado‐García et al, 2020). In spite of using in the present work a different membrane cartridge, having the same characteristics (polysulfone membranes with 0.4 µm pore size and 0.005 m² filtration area) as the cartridge that Nikolay et al (2020b) found to be adequate for yellow fever whole virus processing, product retention did occur again.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In our previous work on zika VLP production (Alvim et al, 2019), although a perfusion run could be stably operated for 30 days at approximately 30 million cells/mL, product retention inside the bioreactor due to membrane fouling was observed. However, considering a recent report (Nikolay et al, 2020b) that showed a polysulfone hollow fiber cartridge to be highly permeable for the YFV, we decided to use a cartridge of hollow fibers having the same characteristics as reported by these authors, with the aim of avoiding fouling and product retention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%