2022
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus classification for viral genomic fragments using PhaGCN2

Abstract: Viruses are the most ubiquitous and diverse entities in the biome. Due to the rapid growth of newly identified viruses, there is an urgent need for accurate and comprehensive virus classification, particularly for novel viruses. Here, we present PhaGCN2, which can rapidly classify the taxonomy of viral sequences at the family level and supports the visualization of the associations of all families. We evaluate the performance of PhaGCN2 and compare it with the state-of-the-art virus classification tools, such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, cytoscape v3.8.0 was used to visualize the network ( 77 ). Considering the major revisions of viral taxonomy in ICTV ( 78 , 79 ), the vOTUs were further annotated using PhaGCN v2.1 with the latest ICTV classification ( 80 , 81 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, cytoscape v3.8.0 was used to visualize the network ( 77 ). Considering the major revisions of viral taxonomy in ICTV ( 78 , 79 ), the vOTUs were further annotated using PhaGCN v2.1 with the latest ICTV classification ( 80 , 81 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taxonomic assignment of viral contigs was performed using PhaGCN2 based on the latest ICTV classification tables [59]. Reference viruses were obtained from the RefSeq viral database (v216, released in Jan. 2023).…”
Section: Viral Contig Identification Taxonomic Classification and Fun...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further investigate specific sequences that were exclusively predicted by different tools, we taxonomically classified them using PhaGCN2.0 (v2.0) 72 . Gene annotation plots were created by a custom python script, after searching the translated amino acid sequences against the PHROG (v4) 73 HMM profile database using HHsearch from the HH-suite (v.3.3.0) 74 .…”
Section: Additional Contigs Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%