2019
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus–Bacteria Interactions: Implications for Prevention and Control of Human Enteric Viruses from Environment to Host

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63 Bacteria-mediated virus coinfection could also promote virus evolution and zoonotic transmission. 16,74 Bacteria and their cellular compounds could promote the environmental persistence, particularly thermostability, of waterborne human pathogenic viruses. Reovirus showed enhanced thermostability at 23−37 °C for hours by interacting with bacterial PG and LPS in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).…”
Section: ■ Interactions Of Viruses and Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…63 Bacteria-mediated virus coinfection could also promote virus evolution and zoonotic transmission. 16,74 Bacteria and their cellular compounds could promote the environmental persistence, particularly thermostability, of waterborne human pathogenic viruses. Reovirus showed enhanced thermostability at 23−37 °C for hours by interacting with bacterial PG and LPS in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).…”
Section: ■ Interactions Of Viruses and Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water is a complex environment containing many coexisting microbes, and the interactions of waterborne human pathogenic viruses and microbiome have significant environmental and public health impacts. This is because viruses in microbial communities could show enhanced infectivity, environmental persistence, and resistance to disinfection, due to the en bloc transmission of the viruses and unique virus–microbiome interactions. Though waterborne human pathogenic viruses do not propagate in their microbial neighbors, virus–microbiome interactions can gather multiple virions for collective infection and potentially provide multiple benefits to the viruses such as increasing the multiplicity of infection (MOI), facilitating genome recombination and reassortment, and evading host immune systems (Figure d). Viruses surrounded by their microbial neighbors (e.g., internalized within FLAs, bound with bacteria, and cloaked within extracellular vesicles) can also dodge the damage caused by environmental stressors and disinfectants (Figure d).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might constitute a key reservoir for chronic infections. Additionally, as discussed by Dawley and Gibson ( 81 ), specific associations of viruses with bacteria or other microorganisms are likely to allow the easier entry of virions into the biofilm, resulting in a reservoir of viruses. These virions are as difficult to remove and inactivate as their bacterial counterparts, turning infections persistent for a long time ( 81 ).…”
Section: Can Microbial Biofilms Favor Viral Reservoirs In Bats?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited information surrounding the occurrence and survival of foodborne viruses in bacterial biofilms in the food sector and their potential role in the viral dissemination in this environment (Dawley & Gibson, 2019). Nevertheless, a first study demonstrating the incorporation and interactions between poliovirus and biofilms present in a wastewater treatment plant was published in 1997 (Quignon et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%