2013
DOI: 10.1101/000869
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virulence in aPseudomonas syringaeStrain with a Small Repertoire of Predicted Effectors

Abstract: 34Both type III effector proteins and non-ribosomal peptide toxins play important 35 roles for Pseudomonas syringae pathogenicity in host plants, but whether and how 36 these virulence pathways interact to promote infection remains unclear. Genomic 37 evidence from one clade of P. syringae suggests a tradeoff between the total number of 38 type III effector proteins and presence of syringomycin, syringopeptin, and syringolin A 39 toxins. Here we report the complete genome sequence from P. syringae CC1557, 40 w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the first microbiology-affiliated preprint was posted on bioRxiv in November 2013 (49), an increasing number of microbiologists are posting their unpublished work to preprint severs as an efficient method for disseminating their research prior to peer review. A number of critical concerns remain about how widespread their adoption will be, how they will be perceived by traditional journals and other scientists, and whether traditional peer review will adapt to the new scientific trends and technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first microbiology-affiliated preprint was posted on bioRxiv in November 2013 (49), an increasing number of microbiologists are posting their unpublished work to preprint severs as an efficient method for disseminating their research prior to peer review. A number of critical concerns remain about how widespread their adoption will be, how they will be perceived by traditional journals and other scientists, and whether traditional peer review will adapt to the new scientific trends and technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%