2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virulence Factors Identified by Cryptococcus neoformans Mutant Screen Differentially Modulate Lung Immune Responses and Brain Dissemination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors, such as urease (15, 26, 50), phospholipase (46, 51), and laccase (27) promote the development of non-protective Th2 immunity and subsequent M2 polarization and confer a fungal growth advantage late during the infection. It is also in contrast with other factors, such as PIK1 , RUB1, ENA1 (28), and VAD1 (52), which confer growth advantages during both the innate and adaptive phase of the immune response but nevertheless predominantly modulate the cytokine environment during the efferent phase of the immune response in C. neoformans -infected lungs. In contrast, Ssa1 directly modulates macrophage- C. neoformans interactions only during the innate phase, with little to no effect on the development of adaptive immunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These factors, such as urease (15, 26, 50), phospholipase (46, 51), and laccase (27) promote the development of non-protective Th2 immunity and subsequent M2 polarization and confer a fungal growth advantage late during the infection. It is also in contrast with other factors, such as PIK1 , RUB1, ENA1 (28), and VAD1 (52), which confer growth advantages during both the innate and adaptive phase of the immune response but nevertheless predominantly modulate the cytokine environment during the efferent phase of the immune response in C. neoformans -infected lungs. In contrast, Ssa1 directly modulates macrophage- C. neoformans interactions only during the innate phase, with little to no effect on the development of adaptive immunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group of virulence-associated genes including a phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase ( PIK1 ), a ubiquitin-like protein ( RUB1 ), and a cation ATPase transporter ( ENA1 ), promote cryptococcal survival in the host’s tissues and thus contribute to early fungal growth. However, the overall level of virulence conferred by each of these factors correlates with their effects on the adaptive immune response polarization and subsequent macrophage polarization status during the efferent phase of host response (28). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8b). Interestingly, infection routes determine the virulence phenotype of ctr1Dctr4D, implying that entry rather than replication of C. neoformans in the brain is critical for fungal virulence in the mouse model 44,45 . Because the ctr1Dctr4D strain remains virulent in the intracerebral infection model, we speculate that there are other Cu uptake machineries in C. neoformans that are active in Cu transport during the formation of meningoencephalitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, subsequently, the wt strain triggers additional IFN-␥ production in the lungs by day 7 but is accompanied by an increase in IL-4, while the ⌬vad1 strain does not induce IL-4, thus maintaining a low IL-4/IFN-␥ ratio (Fig. 5C), known to be beneficial for cryptococcal clearance (19,43). Increased production of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines such as KC and retained production of TNF-␣ likely contributed to effective innate clearance of the mutant strain as suggested by previous studies (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%