Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1998
DOI: 10.2307/2998381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge.

Abstract: Click here if your download doesn"t start automatically By Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge ([Paperback] By Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge ([Paperback] Download By Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski Virtues of the Mind: A ...pdf Read Online By Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski Virtues of the Mind: ...pdf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the process of comprehending a proposition entails an intuitive acceptance of its believability (Gilbert, 1991). Assessing the truthfulness of a belief, and recognizing and correcting false beliefs, is an effortful process (Brashier & Marsh, 2020;Gilbert, 1991;Kahneman, 2011) that rests on a commitment to epistemic values and ethical virtues (Chinn et al, 2011;Pritchard, 2007;Zagzebski, 1996) that support sustained engagement in "unnatural" epistemic acts (Wineburg, 2001). The proliferation of misinformation that appeals to our emotions, social media's use of algorithms that expose people to it based on their predicted engagement, and a 24-hour news cycle that is replete with partisan reporting further insulates people from different perspectives and amplifies the effects of my-side bias (Haidt & Rose-Stockwell, 2019;Hess & McAvoy, 2015;Kahneman, 2011;Pachur et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Nexus Of Culture and Psychology: The Dangers Of Liesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the process of comprehending a proposition entails an intuitive acceptance of its believability (Gilbert, 1991). Assessing the truthfulness of a belief, and recognizing and correcting false beliefs, is an effortful process (Brashier & Marsh, 2020;Gilbert, 1991;Kahneman, 2011) that rests on a commitment to epistemic values and ethical virtues (Chinn et al, 2011;Pritchard, 2007;Zagzebski, 1996) that support sustained engagement in "unnatural" epistemic acts (Wineburg, 2001). The proliferation of misinformation that appeals to our emotions, social media's use of algorithms that expose people to it based on their predicted engagement, and a 24-hour news cycle that is replete with partisan reporting further insulates people from different perspectives and amplifies the effects of my-side bias (Haidt & Rose-Stockwell, 2019;Hess & McAvoy, 2015;Kahneman, 2011;Pachur et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Nexus Of Culture and Psychology: The Dangers Of Liesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, my rejection of relativism is not an endorsement of the metaphysical realist's belief in a world consisting solely of "mind-independent objects" (Putnam, 1981) and a concept of truth that involves the strict correspondence between the words and the things to which they refer. Among other things, scientism leads to a false dichotomy that denies, on the one hand, the rationality of statements about ethics and values, and on the other hand, the relevance of values and ethics in statements of fact (Putnam, 1981(Putnam, , 2002Zagzebski, 1996).…”
Section: Approaching Truthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Baehr's account is part of the responsibilist tradition in virtue epistemology which began with Code (1987),Zagzebski (1996) andMontmarquet (1992). R. C Roberts and Wood (2007),Battaly (2017),.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a consideration of what Peirce called "scientific economy"(McKaughan 2008).34 The literature on epistemic responsibility, for instance, involves non-evidential epistemic norms(Code 1987;Hieronymi 2008;Kornblith 1983;Montmarquet 1992). Virtue epistemologists have elsewhere advocated for non-evidential epistemic normativity(Axtell 1997(Axtell , 2008Zagzebski 1996). Some philosophers of science have explicitly argued that promise (or pursuitworthiness) considerations can be epistemic(Seselja, Kosolosky, & Straßer 2012;Šešelja & Straßer 2014a;Shaw 2020;Whitt 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%