2014
DOI: 10.30958/ajha.2-1-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtue Epistemologies and Epistemic Vice

Abstract: While virtue epistemologists agree that knowledge consists in having beliefs appropriately formed in accordance with epistemic virtue, they disagree regarding what constitutes an epistemic virtue. Some take epistemic virtue to be a character trait. Others take epistemic virtues to be stable naturalistic dispositions which reliably produce true beliefs. There are also other virtue epistemologists who combine character traits and stable naturalistic dispositions into a "mixed" theory. All three focus exclusively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our nature provides for both" (Midgley 2001, p. 3). Uncovering why some agents care little about epistemic goods is surely as important a question as why some agents do care (Kraemer 2015). In terms of the prevalence and influence of epistemic vices, we have little clear understanding of what epistemic vices exist, why they are so prevalent, or what functions, needs, and motives they serve-particularly inside organizations.…”
Section: Epistemic Virtue Gives An Incomplete View Of Epistemic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our nature provides for both" (Midgley 2001, p. 3). Uncovering why some agents care little about epistemic goods is surely as important a question as why some agents do care (Kraemer 2015). In terms of the prevalence and influence of epistemic vices, we have little clear understanding of what epistemic vices exist, why they are so prevalent, or what functions, needs, and motives they serve-particularly inside organizations.…”
Section: Epistemic Virtue Gives An Incomplete View Of Epistemic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the conviction that one has epistemic authority or superiority where one in fact lacks it (Kraemer 2015). It thus involves a false inference about the state of one's knowledge and expertise relative to others (Roberts and Wood 2007).…”
Section: Epistemic Hubrismentioning
confidence: 99%