Virtually impossible: limiting Australian children and adolescents daily screen based media use

Abstract

BackgroundPaediatric recommendations to limit children’s and adolescents’ screen based media use (SBMU) to less than two hours per day appear to have gone unheeded. Given the associated adverse physical and mental health outcomes of SBMU it is understandable that concern is growing worldwide. However, because the majority of studies measuring SBMU have focused on TV viewing, computer use, video game playing, or a combination of these the true extent of total SBMU (including non-sedentary hand held devices) and time spent on specific screen activities remains relatively unknown. This study assesses the amount of time Australian children and adolescents spend on all types of screens and specific screen activities.MethodsWe administered an online instrument specifically developed to gather data on all types of SBMU and SBMU activities to 2,620 (1373 males and 1247 females) 8 to 16 year olds from 25 Australian government and non-government primary and secondary schools.ResultsWe found that 45% of 8 year olds to 80% of 16 year olds exceeded the recommended < 2 hours per day for SBMU. A series of hierarchical linear models demonstrated different relationships between the degree to which total SBMU and SBMU on specific activities (TV viewing, Gaming, Social Networking, and Web Use) exceeded the < 2 hours recommendation in relation to sex and age.ConclusionsCurrent paediatric recommendations pertaining to SBMU may no longer be tenable because screen based media are central in the everyday lives of children and adolescents. In any reappraisal of SBMU exposure times, researchers, educators and health professionals need to take cognizance of the extent to which SBMU differs across specific screen activity, sex, and age.

A Factorial Validation of Parental Mediation Strategies with Regard to Internet Use

“…The study did not identify interaction restrictions as a separate strategy, which could be due to the absence of applicable items included in the factor analysis. Interaction restriction practices might also be less relevant for younger children because they access social network sites to a lesser extent compared to older children (Houghton et al, 2015). Items referring to technical mediation were not included in the factor analysis.…”

Depression, psychological distress and Internet use among community-based Australian adolescents: a cross-sectional study

“…A recent examination of sedentary behaviour among Australian young people reported that most youth exceeded the daily recommendation of ≤2 h of screen time per day, and stated that limiting screen-based media use among children and adolescents was ‘ virtually impossible’ [1]. Internet use represents one component of the broader category leisure screen – time.…”

Shining light inside the tunnel: using photovoice as a strategy to define the needs for health promotion among families of low socioeconomic status

“…The involvement of low-SES families should be supported from the very beginning of the whole programme planning process, to create a better understanding of the issues they perceive (Carlson et al, 2006; Kahraman, 2010; Scheerder, Van der Broucke, & Saan, 2003). Achieving this requires striking a balance between top-down processes initiated by the interventionists and bottom-up processes initiated by the practitioners who work with low-SES families, so as to ensure a tailored programme development and implementation process (Van Kann, Jansen, De Vries, De Vries, & Kremers, 2015). Working with instead of for low-SES families can create a greater ability to ensure the adoption, implementation and continuation of the programme (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2017).…”