2008
DOI: 10.1112/blms/bdn070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtually free pro-p groups whose torsion elements have finite centralizer

Abstract: We fill details in the proof of [HZ, Lemma 13] (that is [4, Lemma 3.2]). For easier reading we include the relevant part of section 3 ibidem. 20E18 (primary), 20E06, 22C05 (secondary). HNN-embeddingWe introduce a notion of a pro-p HNN-group as a generalization of pro-p HNNextension in the sense of [1, page 97]. It also can be defined as a sequence of pro-p HNN-extensions. During the definition to follow, i belongs to a finite set I of indices.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then (G, Γ) is profinitely k-acylindrical if the corresponding action of the profinite completion G on the profinite Bass-Serre tree S( G) is k-acylindrical-that is, whenever γ ∈ G 1, the fixed point set of γ in S( G) has diameter at most k. Note that by Corollary 4 in [10] this means that any element 1 = g ∈ G can fix at most k edges in any (profinite) geodesic [v, w] of S( G).…”
Section: A Combination Theorem For Conjugacy Separable Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then (G, Γ) is profinitely k-acylindrical if the corresponding action of the profinite completion G on the profinite Bass-Serre tree S( G) is k-acylindrical-that is, whenever γ ∈ G 1, the fixed point set of γ in S( G) has diameter at most k. Note that by Corollary 4 in [10] this means that any element 1 = g ∈ G can fix at most k edges in any (profinite) geodesic [v, w] of S( G).…”
Section: A Combination Theorem For Conjugacy Separable Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from this not much is known about Aut(F n ), for example, it is not clear whether the virtual cohomological dimension of Aut(F n ) is finite. Certain progress however has been made in [4] and [5] towards understanding finite p-subgroups of Aut(F n ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let H be a cyclic group of order p r and let ρ : H → GL n (Z p ) be a representation. Then ρ lifts if and only if the Z p H-module M associated to ρ is a direct sum of indecomposable Z p H-modules which are isomorphic either to Z p C p k for some 0 ≤ k ≤ r or to J C p m (C p k ) for some 0 ≤ m < k ≤ r. The proofs of Theorem A and B are constructive in the sense that we give an explicit lifting φ : H → Aut(F n ) in terms of the semidirect product F n φ H. We use the result of [5] describing free-by-cyclic pro-p groups and a free decomposition of [4] for free-by-finite pro-p groups having finite centralizers of torsion elements. The representations in both theorems above are not necessarily faithful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Define an equivalence relation on Σ by putting S 1 ∼ S 2 if S 1 and S 2 are contained in the same maximal finite subgroup of G 0 . This defines an equivalence relation since maximal finite subgroups have trivial intersection by [5,Lemma 9], and it is easy to see that ∼ is closed (indeed if K 1 , K 2 are maximal finite subgroups containing S 1 and S 2 respectively and such that K 1 ∩ K 2 = 1, then there is a finite quotient of G 0 where the images of K 1 and K 2 intersect trivially as well). Put T = Σ/ ∼.…”
Section: Hnn-embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description is a generalization of the main theorem of [5], where the result was obtained in the finitely generated case. Note however that finite generation is a rather restrictive condition in Galois theory and that the finite centralizer condition for torsion elements arises naturally in the study of maximal pro-p Galois groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%