Ieee Infocom 2009 2009
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2009.5062092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VirtualFace: An Algorithm to Guarantee Packet Delivery of Virtual-Coordinate-Based Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been further extended to completely switch to virtual coordinates on the overlay by performing some coordinate transformation [23]. Similarly, a transformation of geographical coordinates into virtual positions that prevent concave holes in the network allows optimized greedy routing relying on GHT-like services [4], [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This approach has been further extended to completely switch to virtual coordinates on the overlay by performing some coordinate transformation [23]. Similarly, a transformation of geographical coordinates into virtual positions that prevent concave holes in the network allows optimized greedy routing relying on GHT-like services [4], [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T HE use of virtual coordinates is currently being investigated for efficient routing in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. In general, WSNs provide an interesting research domain because they represent a class of massively distributed systems in which nodes are required to work in a cooperative and self-organized fashion to overcome scalability problems [6], [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, many routing protocols, such as greedy perimeter stateless routing (GPSR) , greedy‐face‐greedy (GFG) , greedy other adaptive face routing plus (GOAFR+) , gradient landmark‐based distributed routing (GLIDER) , virtual coordinate assignment protocol (VCap) , medial axis‐based naming and routing protocol (MAP) , greedy landmark descent routing (GLDR) , PAG:CFace(3) , greedy‐random‐greedy (GRG) , small‐world iterative navigation greedy (SWING) , greedy‐hull‐greedy (GHG) , axis‐based VCap (ABVCap) , ABVCap in 3D wireless sensor networks (ABVCap _3D) , VirtualFace , ProgressFace , directional virtual coordinate routing (DVCR) , and geological routing (GLR) , have been proposed. However, each has at least one of the following problems: A VCap is needed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protocols like Virtual Cord Protocol (VCP) [4] and Virtual Ring Routing (VRR) [5] build their own coordinate system, which is completely independent of the geographic node positions. Current work on virtual coordinate based approaches focuses on two aspects: The provided quality of service, which is mainly an issue of optimizing the delivery ratio or even providing guarantees [6], [7], and the reliability of the system as a whole, using data replication and other redundancy increasing techniques [8]. Many of these approaches exploit the availability of the virtual ordering (numbering) of the nodes on an overlay that allows the use of Distributed Hash Table (DHT) like operations for data management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%