Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icnp.2006.320213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Surrounding Face Geocasting with Guaranteed Message Delivery for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol then creates a shared path for different destinations. Both protocols [7,8] guarantee delivery of the packets only in a dense network and do not guarantee delivery in a sparse network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The protocol then creates a shared path for different destinations. Both protocols [7,8] guarantee delivery of the packets only in a dense network and do not guarantee delivery in a sparse network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between the algorithm [5] and the one proposed in [6] is that external border nodes in [6] also perform the right-hand based-face traversals with respect to all corresponding neighbors internal border nodes. The authors in [7] proposed Virtual Surrounding Face (VSF). In VSF, the geoacast region is constructed by ignoring the edges intersecting the geocast region in a planar graph.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this issue, GFPG [11], VSF [12], and [13] propose to include out-region nodes in packet dissemination. GFPG uses face routing on the planar faces intersecting the region border in addition to flooding inside the region to reach all nodes.…”
Section: B Geocasting To a Single Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many single-/multi-region geocasting protocols such as in [8], [11], [14], either treat the shape of the geocast regions as a convex closed polygon (square, rectangle, circle), or as in [12], as a concave closed polygon shape. The authors implicitly assume that a closed polygon is described by a set of points and some extra information, e.g., a circle is given by its center and radius, which are included in the packet header.…”
Section: B Shape Of Geocast Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these solutions (e.g., [4], [5]) are based on graph theory, which relies on the unrealistic Unit Disk Graph (UDG) model; also, the impact of imperfect link layer is not considered. As a result, these solutions do not perform well in UW-ASNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%