2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual surgery residency selection: Strategies for programs and candidates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much had to be learned about use of virtual meeting tools for unexpected purposes, such as planning and conducting intern applicant interviews following the 2020 Coalition for Physician Accountability's Work Group's determination that there should be no in‐person interviews for new 2021 residency training positions 86 . The ACS special committee issued broad‐ranging guidelines and recommendations on interview and program information strategies focused on the virtual nature of all 2020–21 interactions with residency and fellowship candidates, 87 but the majority of programs adopted their own solutions, following recommendations from the Association of American Medical Colleges 88 and National Residency Matching Program webinars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much had to be learned about use of virtual meeting tools for unexpected purposes, such as planning and conducting intern applicant interviews following the 2020 Coalition for Physician Accountability's Work Group's determination that there should be no in‐person interviews for new 2021 residency training positions 86 . The ACS special committee issued broad‐ranging guidelines and recommendations on interview and program information strategies focused on the virtual nature of all 2020–21 interactions with residency and fellowship candidates, 87 but the majority of programs adopted their own solutions, following recommendations from the Association of American Medical Colleges 88 and National Residency Matching Program webinars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some programs recommended decreasing the length of each individual interview due to decreased attention span in a virtual setting [ 11 ], however, others warned that longer interviews were needed for applicants to adequately assess the program [ 12 ]. After trialing 30-min and 20-min interviews, we ultimately settled on each candidate having three 25-min interviews with a paired faculty member and resident, as well as shorter “speed dating” style interviews with the Program Director, Associate Program Director, and Chairperson.…”
Section: Organizing the Interview Daymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, signaling is done naturally (i.e., choosing to do an away rotation, or attending a second look). With constraints in place limiting applicants’ abilities to naturally signal their interest, an artificial signaling system could help programs ensure they are interviewing and ranking applicants who are genuinely interested [ 9 , 11 , 25 ]. A third suggestion is for programs to simply interview more people [ 11 ], however, most programs agree this would be an unnecessary hassle with minimal reward, particularly, if the other safeguards are put in place [ 9 ].…”
Section: Increased Number Of Applications Per Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations