Virtual Residency Interviews: Applicant Perceptions Regarding Virtual Interview Effectiveness, Advantages, and Barriers

Abstract

Background Studies of the virtual interview format are needed to inform medical residency program leaders as they plan for future virtual interview seasons. Objective In the current study, completed in 2021, we sought to assess applicant perspectives of virtual interview effectiveness, advantages, and barriers, including factors that might impact equity and inclusion. Methods Interviewees applying to 7 residency programs and 2 clinical psychology programs at an academic medical center in the Pacific Northwest completed a post-interview survey. Results A total of 565 of 1429 interviewees (40%) completed the survey. A vast majority (83%–96%) agreed virtual interviews were effective in each measured domain, except for learning institutional culture (352 of 565, 62%). Many also found information regarding social/living environments inadequate. Participants selected advantages to virtual interviews more frequently than disadvantages. Commonly selected advantages included cost savings, time efficiency, reduced burden of travel, and reduced carbon footprint. Disadvantages included time zone differences, access to an appropriate interview setting, and reliable access to internet. The majority of interviewees (84%, 456 of 542) desired to keep a component of virtual interviews in the future. There were no significant disparities in results based on gender, rural/suburban/urban location, race, or underrepresented minority status. Conclusions Virtual interviews were perceived as effective, more advantageous than burdensome, and widely acceptable, with no disparities in these findings by included demographic characteristics.

Effectiveness of Virtual Residency Interviews: Interviewer Perspectives

“…We previously reported survey development methods and applicant perspectives. 37 The current analysis assesses interviewer responses.…”

Emerging from the Pandemic: AAIM Recommendations for Internal Medicine Residency and Fellowship Interview Standards

“…Virtual interviewing offers an efficient and widely acceptable format for both applicants and programs. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 The efficiency offered by virtual interviews results in time savings for applicants, minimizing time away from their clinical education and training as well as greater flexibility in interview scheduling. All-virtual interviews reduce financial costs associated with the interview process for both applicants and programs.…”

“… 1 , 2 , 3 Early data from all-virtual GME interview experiences suggest that virtual interviews are widely acceptable to applicants as well as to program directors and allow both groups to adequately learn about each other. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 New recommendations are needed to guide what successful elements of virtual season interview cycles should continue as travel restrictions end.…”

Re: A chance for reform: the environmental impact of travel for general surgery residency interviews

“…A study performed by Domingo et al (2022) sought to assess applicants' perspectives of virtual interviews in the Pacific Northwest. 7 A majority (83-96%) of respondents found virtual interviews to be more effective across several domains, including comfort and connection, and 84% expressed desires to keep components of virtual interviews in the future. 7 While these findings do not claim to be representative of all medical learners, they highlight the need to explore learner experiences and attitudes before returning to pre-COVID-19 era practices.…”