2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Reality Simulation for Pediatric Airway Intubation Readiness Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agasthya et al evaluated the value of a 19-min immersive tutorial (interventional group) on intubating an infant manikin, in a controlled trial. The primary endpoint (the performance accuracy measured by a checklist) did not differ between groups [ 41 ]. Over 20 years ago, Colt et al established a VR bronchoscopy simulation for critical care medicine.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agasthya et al evaluated the value of a 19-min immersive tutorial (interventional group) on intubating an infant manikin, in a controlled trial. The primary endpoint (the performance accuracy measured by a checklist) did not differ between groups [ 41 ]. Over 20 years ago, Colt et al established a VR bronchoscopy simulation for critical care medicine.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the participants’ comments suggest that the larger issue was that the simulated equipment could not be moved around the room and positioned spontaneously to set up for the procedure, a functional limitation that could be addressed with relatively simple software and programming adjustments. This opportunity for improvement is supported by previous literature that has described the successful use of VR to simulate pediatric airway intubation [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Only one study reported the age of participants of 26 to 47 years (Viciana‐Abad et al, 2004). The remaining studies did not indicate the age of participants (Agasthya et al, 2020; Dhanasree et al, 2018; McLean et al, 2016; Ralston et al, 2021). Number of participants within the included studies ranged from six to 45 (Agasthya et al, 2020;McLean et al, 2016; Ralston et al, 2021; Viciana‐Abad et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%