2022
DOI: 10.1177/1071181322661324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Reality Simulation for Emergency Management teams – A Literature Review

Abstract: The objective of this review was to provide a summary of virtual reality (VR) simulation for emergency management (EM) teams and suggest future research agenda items. A systematic literature review was conducted using three databases: PsycINFO, Compendex (Engineering Village), and Web of Science. A total of five articles met inclusion criteria and thus were reviewed here. Our review identified four common aspects of VR-based EM team simulation: coordination, communication, decision-making, and situation awaren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the firefighting simulation, 'The Squad', is very similar to contemporary computer games, we assumed that providing tutorials and training scenarios would be sufficient to make the participants possess necessary skills for the simulation. Further, emergency management simulation is increasingly used as an alternative and safe research platform (Dos Santos & Son, 2022). Second, firefighting team members in our study have not known or worked together.…”
Section: Expected Results and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the firefighting simulation, 'The Squad', is very similar to contemporary computer games, we assumed that providing tutorials and training scenarios would be sufficient to make the participants possess necessary skills for the simulation. Further, emergency management simulation is increasingly used as an alternative and safe research platform (Dos Santos & Son, 2022). Second, firefighting team members in our study have not known or worked together.…”
Section: Expected Results and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%