2023
DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-23-00078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Reality Is an Effective Tool for Learning Techniques in Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Background: There is a scarcity of aggregate literature reporting on the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) concerning surgical skill development within the realm of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of VR on the training of orthopaedic surgery residents and medical students learning surgical techniques in arthroplasty. Methods: A systematic review was conducted querying PubMed, Cochrane Trials, and Embase in September 2022. Studies were inclu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondary outcomes also favour VR, including error rates and procedure duration. A subsequent THA study found faster task completion in the VR group [ 5 ], and pooled data in a meta-analysis found no notable differences in global competence with VR; however, the procedure duration was shorter [ 10 ]. Most studies investigating VR have measured procedure duration, used measurement tools for global competency assessment and may not include key elements of surgical competencies that influence the outcome [ 1 , 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary outcomes also favour VR, including error rates and procedure duration. A subsequent THA study found faster task completion in the VR group [ 5 ], and pooled data in a meta-analysis found no notable differences in global competence with VR; however, the procedure duration was shorter [ 10 ]. Most studies investigating VR have measured procedure duration, used measurement tools for global competency assessment and may not include key elements of surgical competencies that influence the outcome [ 1 , 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%