Virtual reality head-mounted display for endoscopically-assisted implant surgery

Matsuo, Akira; Hamada, Hayato; Oba, Hideo; Shibata, Kan-ichi

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.04.002

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Multimedia Appendix 1 [20][21][22][23][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]]. Among the 15 eligible studies, 5 studies [22,23,37,38] involved volunteers or patients, 2 studies were performed on cadavers [39][40][41], 5 studies [20,[42][43][44][45] involved plastic models, and 3 studies [21,46,47] used actual patient casts. Regarding the type of edentulous jaw, the number of mandibles (98/157, 62.4%) was higher than that of maxillary jaws (59/157, 37.6%), and the amount of partial edentulism (9/14, 64%) was higher than that of complete edentulism (5/14, 36%).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The number and type of edentulism were not reported in a previous study [23]. Regarding implant placements, 7 studies involved [22,[37][38][39][40][41]45] dental implants, 2 studies [21,47] used pins, and 4 studies [42][43][44]46] exploited drill channels to measure implant positional deviations. Two studies [20,23] did not clarify the number of implant placements.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Not required 1280 × 720 resolution HMD (Sony HMZ-T1 personal 3D viewer) Lin et al [46] The software developed by the Visualization Toolkit Polaris (Northern Digital Inc) Not required Jiang et al [47] NR NR A head-mounted image processor unit (HMS-3000MT; Sony Corp) Matsuo et al [37] The computer was equipped with a high-performance GPU (GTX950, Nvidia Corp) Polaris (Northern Digital Inc) An IV overlay device includes a 9.7-in 3D display with a resolution of 1536 × 2048 pixels, which is covered by a microlens array with a lens pitch of 1.016 mm and a focal length of 3.0 mm (NR) Ma et al [21] A dedicated software created by Fifthingenium Navigation system ImplaNav (BresMedical) Virtual reality glasses (HoloLens, Microsoft) Pellegrino et al [22] Digital scenes can be rendered and mixed with the camera's stereo views using OpenGL APIs for AR surgical navigation (NR) A customized stereo camera is built to track the patient's teeth (shape tracking; NR) Not required Wang et al [38] The proposed system is implemented by using MATLAB R2019a; for the experiment, a system configured with Intel Core i5-3337U CPU@2.4 GHz and 4.00-GB RAM was used NR NR Shrestha et al [23] Innooral (…”

Section: Optical Tracker (Micron Tracker 2 Sx60; Claron Technology Inc)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Accuracy of Augmented Reality–Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Mai¹,

Dam²,

Lee³

2023

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The novel concept of immersive 3D augmented reality (AR) surgical navigation has recently been introduced in the medical field. This method allows surgeons to directly focus on the surgical objective without having to look at a separate monitor. In the dental field, the recently developed AR-assisted dental implant navigation system (AR navigation), which uses innovative image technology to directly visualize and track a presurgical plan over an actual surgical site, has attracted great interest. Objective This study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis study that aimed to assess the accuracy of dental implants placed by AR navigation and compare it with that of the widely used implant placement methods, including the freehand method (FH), template-based static guidance (TG), and conventional navigation (CN). Methods Individual search strategies were used in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to search for articles published until March 21, 2022. This study was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database. Peer-reviewed journal articles evaluating the positional deviations of dental implants placed using AR-assisted implant navigation systems were included. Cohen d statistical power analysis was used to investigate the effect size estimate and CIs of standardized mean differences (SMDs) between data sets. Results Among the 425 articles retrieved, 15 articles were considered eligible for narrative review, 8 articles were considered for single-arm meta-analysis, and 4 were included in a 2-arm meta-analysis. The mean lateral, global, depth, and angular deviations of the dental implant placed using AR navigation were 0.90 (95% CI 0.78-1.02) mm, 1.18 (95% CI 0.95-1.41) mm, 0.78 (95% CI 0.48-1.08) mm, and 3.96° (95% CI 3.45°-4.48°), respectively. The accuracy of AR navigation was significantly higher than that of the FH method (SMD=−1.01; 95% CI −1.47 to −0.55; P<.001) and CN method (SMD=−0.46; 95% CI −0.64 to −0.29; P<.001). However, the accuracies of the AR navigation and TG methods were similar (SMD=0.06; 95% CI −0.62 to 0.74; P=.73). Conclusions The positional deviations of AR-navigated implant placements were within the safety zone, suggesting clinically acceptable accuracy of the AR navigation method. Moreover, the accuracy of AR implant navigation was comparable with that of the highly recommended dental implant–guided surgery method, TG, and superior to that of the conventional FH and CN methods. This review highlights the possibility of using AR navigation as an effective and accurate immersive surgical guide for dental implant placement.

show abstract

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Optical Tracker (Micron Tracker 2 Sx60; Claron Technology Inc)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Accuracy of Augmented Reality–Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Mai¹,

Dam²,

Lee³

2023

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The use of a surgical microscope has been regarded as a crucial factor that contributes to excellent results. Meanwhile, since various endoscopic surgeries, including excision in the submandibular salivary gland,[ 1 ] fixation of mandibular condyle fractures,[ 2 ] implant surgery,[ 3 ] and facial tumor resection,[ 4 ] have been introduced in craniomaxillofacial surgery, it has become increasingly popular as a result of minimally invasive surgeries, safer treatments, and less surgical complications. Therefore, it has become widespread due to the several advantages of endoscopic surgery.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical strategy of endoscopically assisted periradicular surgery using novel head-mounted display system

Sukegawa

Kanno

Matsuo

et al. 2020

Ann Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A novel head-mounted display offers high quality of endoscopic imagery in front of the eyes, irrespective of the head position. We present an application of the head-mounted display system as a personal integrated multi-image monitoring system in endoscopically assisted periradicular surgery. Our head-mounted display system displayed multiple forms of information as integrated, sharp, high-definition endoscope, biological monitor, and X-ray image (such as panoramic and computed tomography images) synchronously using a picture in picture. In addition, this system can cope with both the endoscopic field of view and the direct field of view. While monitoring the patient's general condition with a head-mounted display, the surgery was performed with endoscopic animation. We could also switch to the direct surgical field and endoscopic field of view smoothly without moving the head and without surgical interference. The availability of a head-mounted display system during endoscopically assisted periradicular surgery enabled the provision of a comfortable and appropriate surgical environment for the surgeon.

show abstract

Computer-Assisted Navigation Surgery in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Sukegawa

Kanno

2021

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and navigation offers significant improvements in patient orientation and safety in every facet of our specialty of maxillofacial surgery. Ranging from precisely planned orthognathic procedures to the removal of foreign bodies requiring extremely flexible surgical options, and from minimally invasive dental implantology procedures to radical tumor resections of the skull base, they have made their mark for improving the procedure safety, predictability, and accuracy of surgery and options for intraoperative adaptations. In the future, the application of CAS is expected to further reduce operative risks and surgery time, accompanied by a considerable decrease in patient stress.Navigation systems are effective for delicate and accurate oral and maxillofacial surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, and orthopedic surgery.This section presents an overview of available navigation systems and their applications with a focus on clinical utility and the solutions they offer for problems/challenges in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

show abstract

Virtual reality head-mounted display for endoscopically-assisted implant surgery

Cited by 8 publications

References 2 publications

Accuracy of Augmented Reality–Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Accuracy of Augmented Reality–Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Surgical strategy of endoscopically assisted periradicular surgery using novel head-mounted display system

Computer-Assisted Navigation Surgery in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About