2023
DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Reality for Anxiety Reduction in Women Undergoing Colposcopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Julia M. Hecken,
Pia Halagiera,
Sadia Rehman
et al.

Abstract: ObjectiveTo test whether headset-delivered virtual reality (VR) content affects satisfaction and/or anxiety in women with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions undergoing colposcopy and colposcopically guided cervical biopsy.MethodsIn this single-center, randomized trial, the authors measured overall satisfaction (100-mm visual analog scale) and situation-specific anxiety (STAI-S) in 247 women with suspected cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions wearing either no VR headset (arm 1, control) or a VR hea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this, it is not surprising that some studies examining the use of VR for reducing pain during surgical interventions, such as biopsies, did not find VR to be beneficial [24]. In such a setting, the factors described above are not at play, and VR's mode of action can merely be distraction, which may or may not work and might even be counterproductive, although varying results have been described [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In line with this, it is not surprising that some studies examining the use of VR for reducing pain during surgical interventions, such as biopsies, did not find VR to be beneficial [24]. In such a setting, the factors described above are not at play, and VR's mode of action can merely be distraction, which may or may not work and might even be counterproductive, although varying results have been described [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%