2015
DOI: 10.3103/s074792391501003x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual private network technologies in real-time geophysical data collection systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare these two technologies we've set a virtual laboratory with virtual machines acting as clients, routers with NAT and servers. The results of this benchmark showed a 15-20% speed advantage of SSTP over OpenVPN, while OpenVPN performed better in packet loss conditions [6]. We should note that Microsoft SSTP is limited to x86 (Intel Architecture 32 bit) and x86-64 (also known as AMD64) Microsoft Windows platforms, although Linux implementation has no such limitation.…”
Section: Acquisition Station and Data Transfermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To compare these two technologies we've set a virtual laboratory with virtual machines acting as clients, routers with NAT and servers. The results of this benchmark showed a 15-20% speed advantage of SSTP over OpenVPN, while OpenVPN performed better in packet loss conditions [6]. We should note that Microsoft SSTP is limited to x86 (Intel Architecture 32 bit) and x86-64 (also known as AMD64) Microsoft Windows platforms, although Linux implementation has no such limitation.…”
Section: Acquisition Station and Data Transfermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Pada pengujian perbandingan SSTP & OpenVPN yang dilakukan (Aleshin, I.;Vasiliev, A.;Kholodkov, K.;Perederin, 2015) menghasilkan kesimpulan pada jaringan yan tidak stabil dengan throughput yang rendah, kapasitas SSTP lebih tinggi dibandingkan OpenVPN. (Farly et al, 2017) melakukan implementasi dan pengujian protocol SSTP dan L2TP yang menghasilkan kesimpulan total packet loss pada SSTP terhadap 20 kali percoban pengiriman lebih kecil dibandingkan protocol L2TP.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The latter facilitates network deployment greatly because the station needs an IP address to accept connections with and global IPv4 address exhaustion makes assigning an IPv4 address to each station nearly impossible. However this stratagem is not always viable and in case IPv4 address depletion makes trouble there is another solutionutilizing virtual private networks as shown in [Aleshin et al, 2015].…”
Section: Real Time Data Acquisition Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%