Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation

Abstract

Objectives Medical error is a significant cause of patient harms in clinical practice, but education and training are recognised as having a key role in minimising their incidence. The use of virtual patient (VP) activities targeting training in medical error allows learners to practice patient management in a safe environment. The inclusion of branched decision-making elements in the activities has the potential to drive additional generative cognitive processing and improved learning outcomes, but the increased cognitive load on learning risks negatively affecting learner motivation. The aim of this study is to better understand the impact that the inclusion of decision-making and inducing errors within the VP activities has on learner motivation. Methods Using a repeated study design, over a period of six weeks we provided undergraduate medical students at six institutions in three countries with a series of six VPs written around errors in paediatric practice. Participants were divided into two groups and received either linearly structured VPs or ones that incorporated branched decision-making elements. Having completed all the VPs, each participant was asked to complete a survey designed to assess their motivation and learning strategies. Results Our analysis showed that in general, there was no significant difference in learner motivation between those receiving the linear VPs and those who received branched decision-making VPs. The same results were generally reflected across all six institutions. Conclusions The findings demonstrated that the inclusion of decision-making elements did not make a significant difference to undergraduate medical students’ motivation, perceived self-efficacy or adopted learning strategies. The length of the intervention was sufficient for learners to overcome any increased cognitive load associated with branched decision-making elements being included in VPs. Further work is required to establish any immediate impact within periods shorter than the length of our study or upon achieved learning outcomes.

Exploring medical students’ perceptions of individual and group-based clinical reasoning with virtual patients: a qualitative study

“…Among these contributions, VPs provided learning permanence, boosted clinical reasoning skills, provided experience in treatment processes, reduced anxiety levels, increased motivation and professional self-confidence, and created a sense of treating real patients without the risk of harming them. These results supported the outcomes of previous studies [ 6 , 8 , 34 – 36 ]. Although VPs elicited little effect on knowledge acquisition, VP users prepared themselves for clinical experience and viewed them as a good resource to help them reinforce their skills [ 37 ].…”

Optimizing soft skills acquisition through simulation training: balancing realism and academic stress in a longitudinal cohort study

“…The longitudinal cohort study was done at Karaganda Medical University in October and November of 2022. The study utilized a diverse set of ve simulation techniques, encompassing a standardized patient, the high-delity simulator CAE Apollo [12], and three different types of virtual patients: the screen simulator AcademiX3D [13], the interactive immersive trainer Body Interact [14], and the text-based simulator Open Labyrinth [15,16] (Table 1). Each student navigated through ve challenging clinical scenarios, namely, anaphylactic shock (AS), limb trauma, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), arrhythmia, and hypertensive crisis (HC).…”

Ventajas, desventajas y ocho recomendaciones para la educación médica virtual en tiempos del COVID-19: Revisión de Tema

“…El uso de herramientas como pacientes virtuales permite a los estudiantes cometer errores sin las presiones de enfrentarse a una persona real. Además, les permite recibir una retroalimentación orientada en sus errores y tener un seguimiento de su desempeño para identificar puntos a fortalecer (16).…”