2021
DOI: 10.1364/ao.444106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy using the k-Wave method

Abstract: Deep learning has been widely used in image processing, quantitative analysis, and other applications in optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM). It requires a large amount of photoacoustic data for training and testing. However, due to the complex structure, high cost, slow imaging speed, and other factors of OR-PAM, it is difficult to obtain enough data required by deep learning, which limits the research of deep learning in OR-PAM to a certain extent. To solve this problem, a virtual OR-PAM bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DoF of OR‐PAM can be doubled without sacrificing lateral resolution. In this work, the virtual OR‐PAM [17] was used to obtain the multi‐focus 3D photoacoustic dataset for volumetric information fusion. The virtual OR‐PAM is based on k‐wave, a commonly used simulation tool for photoacoustic imaging, which can realize the conventional Gaussian‐beam OR‐PAM through the setting of light source and ultrasonic probe, two‐dimensional raster scanning and signal processing.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The DoF of OR‐PAM can be doubled without sacrificing lateral resolution. In this work, the virtual OR‐PAM [17] was used to obtain the multi‐focus 3D photoacoustic dataset for volumetric information fusion. The virtual OR‐PAM is based on k‐wave, a commonly used simulation tool for photoacoustic imaging, which can realize the conventional Gaussian‐beam OR‐PAM through the setting of light source and ultrasonic probe, two‐dimensional raster scanning and signal processing.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the block size significantly influences the fusion, we updated the size of the blocks through DE algorithm to adaptively obtain the optimized block size. As shown in Figure 1A, the multi‐focus photoacoustic data P 1 and P 2 with the size of H × W × L were obtained through the virtual OR‐PAM [17]. P 1 and P 2 were decomposed into eight wavelet coefficients LLL, LLH, LHL, LHH, HHL, HHH, HLH, and HLL (where H represents high‐frequency filtering, L represents low‐frequency filtering) using 3D‐SWT, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The blocks detected as focused were preserved in the fused coefficients thereafter and large-volumetric and high-resolution photoacoustic data can be achieved by inverse stationary wavelet transform. As shown in Figure 1, the multi-focus photoacoustic data P1 and P2 with size of H×W×L were obtained through the virtual OR-PAM [9] . P1 and P2 were decomposed into 8 wavelet coefficients LLL, LLH, LHL, LHH, HHL, HHH, HLH and HLL (where H represents high-frequency filtering, L represents lowfrequency filtering) using 3D-SWT, respectively.…”
Section: D Fusion Based On Joint Weighted Evaluation Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous works, a photoacoustic microscopy imaging simulation platform based on k-Wave simulation toolbox was built to solve the problem of small depth of field in traditional optical microscopy imaging system, where Gaussian beam was used to stimulate the initial photoacoustic signal [7,8] . However, the complexity of the imaging platform makes it difficult to adjust parameters intuitively and conveniently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%